[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       perl-datetime
Subject:    Re: DateTime::Lite
From:       Daisuke Maki <daisuke () endeworks ! jp>
Date:       2008-11-25 2:11:26
Message-ID: 492B5ECE.1060703 () endeworks ! jp
[Download RAW message or body]


> Isn't this just a test of load times? How could using methods vs 
> functions make any difference to a module's load times?

ah, well, um, I was still waking up when I wrote the email?


> Yes, it makes sense that not creating all those namespaces would reduce 
> memory usage.
> 
> I'm a little leary of changing things now, since it'd be backwards 
> incompatible. I wonder if anyone actually relies on those objects having 
> a namespace that includes the time zone though.

As a programmer I'd say to hell with wasted memory, but as a product 
manager, I'd say keep it in the current state until you come up with a 
major upgrade (version 1.00, or something).

At this point I'd rather see DateTime as a possibly heavy, but reliable 
reference point than to have its interface changed, so I can safely 
recommend DateTime.pm to anybody, while sneaking things like DT::Lite as 
a quick hack.


--d
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]