[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pear-doc
Subject:    RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DOC] Documentation, round 2
From:       LIMBOURG Arnaud <arnaud.limbourg.prestataire () cegetel ! fr>
Date:       2003-04-28 6:59:55
[Download RAW message or body]


> > What problem does this package solve?
> > 
> > How does it solve this problem?
> > 
> > How does it differ from other pre-existing packages in PEAR?
> 
> That would at least solve the worst documentation problems. The answer
> to the last question should be optional IMO.

I agree on the last one being optional and the first two points mandatory.
PEAR policy is trying to avoid duplicate packages when "just for the sake of
having more than one packages".

Arnaud.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]