[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pcc-list
Subject:    Re: [Pcc] Like to contribute
From:       Peter Kuschnerus <peter.kuschnerus () gmx ! de>
Date:       2014-03-31 12:23:51
Message-ID: loom.20140331T142001-738 () post ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Anders Magnusson <ragge <at> ludd.ltu.se> writes:

> what might be better would be to change it to a COMOP, but that needs 
> good regression tests first.


Hi,
Yes I missed some details.

Then I tested using COMOP in optim.c.

I tested successfully the removal of subtrees through COMOP.
Then I tested the not-removal of ASSIGN and CALL in subtrees through COMMOP.
Also successfulliy.

Further I found 9 diffrent cases to optimise wehere to apply COMMOP.
And 5 other cases without COMOP.

I implemented theese and tested it.
Then some regressions should be applied.

Now how to prceed with this ?

 
Regards
Peter Kuschnerus




_______________________________________________
Pcc mailing list
Pcc@lists.ludd.ltu.se
http://lists.ludd.ltu.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pcc
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]