[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pcc-list
Subject:    Re: pcc 1.1 alpha release any time soon?
From:       Irek Szczesniak <iszczesniak () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-04-18 17:32:26
Message-ID: CALnxO55Z-Sw7_8BLGV402Mv=qWf0TOB1_NqhPN9x_=h8nwdPdQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Susi Lehtola
<jussilehtola@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:39:21 +0200
> Irek Szczesniak <iszczesniak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Secondly, before a pcc 1.1 release I would like to get pcc working
>> > on linux once again. As I reported in December, for some reason
>> > binaries compiled with current versions of gcc don't return the
>> > right value - return 0 ends up returning 96.
>>
>> Does this happen for pcc binaries compiled with pcc itself? Does gcc
>> report any suspicious warnings? Does valgrind report anything? Can you
>> bisect the source repository commits to narrow down the commit which
>> caused the break?
>
> I can't compile pcc with pcc itself since pcc compiled with gcc.
>
> I'll try bisecting as soon as the www server gets back up.

Thank you for your help!

Irek
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]