[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pcc-list
Subject:    Re: Status report 100829
From:       Jesus Sanchez <zexel_ut () hotmail ! com>
Date:       2010-08-29 15:16:59
Message-ID: BLU0-SMTP6826BA01F7E2F58A0FD0E3FF880 () phx ! gbl
[Download RAW message or body]


  El 29/08/2010 16:17, Anders Magnusson escribió:
> Hi,
>
> now the summer is over, and pcc hacking starts again.
>
> I have checked in another largish diff that affect variable declarations; they are now
> delayed until it is known whether it's a variable, function or prototype that is being declared.
> It fixes directly a few bug reports, but also should make the code path cleaner.
> More to clean here though.
>
> The basis for this change is that declarations can be quite exciting today; for example
>
> int *(*xx2(int a, char b[a+3][a+x()], long (*c)(void)))(float c) {
>
> must handle variables correctly (a must be declared, c should not be redeclared etc...).
>
> -- Ragge
>
>

I'm reading the diff changes (as my c knowledge allows
me to understand) and it's an amazing work.

Hands down to ragge, lord of c compilers awesomeness.

Keep up with the great work.
-J
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]