[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: paraview
Subject: Re: [Paraview] which VTK
From: Peter F Bradshaw <pfb () exadios ! com>
Date: 2005-12-14 12:28:18
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0512142020520.726 () goldmund ! pri
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi Dominik;
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Dominik Szczerba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I once have asked this question, but didint get an answer. I didnt
> conclude much from the Wiki pages either: what is the reason Paraview
> uses its own VTK version?
>
> 1) Which version is it (CVS?) and what/why modifications are made to it?
The version of VTK distributed with Paraview 2.2.1 is VTK V4.5.0. The
class docs for this version are avaliable from (if no other place):
http://personal.exadios.com/Multibeam/doc/htdocs/Class/VTK/html/
>
> 2) I use both VTK (from C/C++) and Paraview (stand-alone) and I see
> little sense in compiling VTK twice. If the Paraview's versions is
> newer, which one is it / what are the differences to the official
> version? If the official VTK version is OK to use to compile Paraview,
> how can I disable redundant compilation and reuse VTK available on my
> system?
VTK V4.5.0 seems to be closer to V5.0 than it is to VTK V4.4.
>
> thank you and regards,
> Dominik
>
>
Cheers
--
Peter F Bradshaw, http://www.exadios.com, ICQ 75431157 (exadios).
Public key at www.exadios.com/pfb.pgp.key and www.exadios.com/pfb.gpg.key
"I love truth, and the way the government still uses it occasionally to
keep us guessing." - Sam Kekovich.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic