[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: owl-users
Subject: [owl-users] Antwort: [owl-users] TCP-Tuning
From: "Tobias Roppelt" <Tobias.Roppelt () mail ! ssb-ag ! de>
Date: 2006-05-04 12:43:25
Message-ID: OF96FDC1AF.3CA2DBFB-ONC1257164.0042668D-C1257164.0045C651 () ssb-ag ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
You may give little more info.
"iptables -L -v" or
"ipchains -L -v" (whatever you use)
"ip route"
"arp"
"mii-tool -v <INT>"
"ifconfig <INT>"
"free -t"
"dmesg"
How is your gw connected to the local network (switch, hub, x-over)?
Tobias
> ---------+----------------------------->
> > Bernhard Fischer |
> > <bernhard@fischli.|
> > org> |
> > >
> > 04.05.2006 13:07 |
> > Bitte antworten an|
> > owl-users |
> > >
> ---------+----------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| \
| | An: owl-users@lists.openwall.com \
| | Kopie: \
| | Thema: [owl-users] TCP-Tuning \
| >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Problem: while transfering data through a dual-hosted-nat gateway,
bandwidth differs about factor 5..10 instead of direct connections.
1. scenarion: single machine
- machine directly connected to the internet
- transfering 10MB of data within 10 seconds
so far, so good!
2. scenario: gateway
- two lan-interfaces (WAN: 10Mbit, LAN: 100Mbit)
- transfering 10MB of data through the gateway within 122 seconds ?!?
How do i have to configure both lan-interfaces for best throughput?
When i look at the traffic-statistiks, there is a gap of 200ms silence
followed by 300ms transmission. Why?
Any help or hints are very welcome!
Greetings
Bernhard
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic