[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: owfs-developers
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] ds9490, usb_bulk_read timeout on RH ES5
From: "Jim Kusznir" <jkusznir () gmail ! com>
Date: 2008-02-26 22:06:14
Message-ID: df8c8a6d0802261406p56e2cd67u8d3bb62f2b62dd2d () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
I am running OWFS on several CentOS5 boxes without any issues. I was
using owfs from the various repos (I believe I was using rpmforge as
my repo). That was working fine, except for DS2406 EPROM Write
support, so I now run SVN releases. In either case, it is fine,
although requires tweaking udev to work as a non-root user. If you
test as root and it still doesn't work, you've got other issues.
--Jim
SmartHome Lab Director
School of EECS, WSU
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Chris Maresca <ckm@crust.net> wrote:
> > Just as an FYI, Centos is a free/open version of the corresponding
> > RedHat Enterprise version. So Centos 5 is RHES 5, etc. It's exactly
> > the same, including updates and patches.
> >
> > The reality is that RHES is composed of almost entirely Open Source
> > licensed code, so they can't really keep it private. Centos is that
> > same code with the trademarks and logos ripped out. So is Oracle Linux
> > and there are probably others.
> >
> > So, if you are wondering about RHES, you can just download and use
> > Centos. The reason why companies use RHES instead of Centos is that
> > they need a single point of contact and a vendor for problems. It's
> > also much easier to deal with in their software acquisition process.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> >
> >
> > Gregg C Levine wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > > Yes, Paul, you are indeed correct concerning the version names. That's the
> > > latest incarnation of what RH was giving away for free once. Now you get a
> > > box of the code on one DVD or many separate CDs, and they require the user
> > > to arrange for support via a paid-for contract.
> > >
> > > The big problem is that the work station release rarely works properly as
> > > regards sound on one particular family of systems. George check the release
> > > versions of udev on your working system versus anything available from RH.
> > > Complain to them.
> > >
> > > And here's the really funny part. Anything that makes sense in the Fedora
> > > Core project's efforts as they create release after release as a "rolling
> > > beta" ends up getting released as a new version of the Enterprise series.
> > > --
> > > Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon@worldnet.att.net
> > > "The Force will be with you always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owfs-developers-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > [mailto:owfs-developers-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Paul
> > > Alfille
> > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:19 PM
> > > To: George Follis
> > > Cc: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] ds9490, usb_bulk_read timeout on RH ES5
> > >
> > > Hello George,
> > >
> > > I forwarded your note to the owfs-developers maillist.
> > >
> > > There are udev updates from Sven Geggus and Jan Kandziora summarized at
> > > http://owfs.org/index.php?page=udev-and-usb.
> > >
> > > I'm not familiar with ES[3-5] and google was too non-specific when I first
> > > saw your query. RedHat versions?
> > >
> > > Paul Alfille
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:56 PM, George Follis <follis@necunified.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > Paul,
> > > your owfs project seems to be the most current code out there that
> > > attempts to access the Dallas Semiconductor devices. I'm getting
> > > desperate ... I have code from Dallas Semi that worked properly on ES3 /
> > > ES4 Red Hat now when compiled on ES5 it fails during a 'Get Status' call
> > > with a timeout error. The first request to DS was of no help - they
> > > simply replied that they were not aware of anyone having issues on ES5.
> > >
> > > If some one could point me in the proper direction - hopefully one that
> > > I didn't know existed. I think I could get this going. I discovered the
> > > udev changes and created the need scripts to change the access mode of
> > > the device. Anything else? Thanks.
> > >
> > > GRFollis
>
> Hello!
> Correct Chris. However Paul was curious about the term, and naturally
> I decided to explain that.
>
> In fact more shops use Centos instead of RHEL for non-specific jobs,
> those that they aren't worried about. In fact my distribution
> Slackware, is also getting ahead more then most people think. But that
> is an argument for a different place and time.
> --
> Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@gmail.com
> "This signature was once found posting rude
> messages in English in the Moscow subway."
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Owfs-developers mailing list
> Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic