[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       outages-discussion
Subject:    Re: [Outages-discussion] Issues between NTT and Verizon
From:       Dovid Bender <dovid () telecurve ! com>
Date:       2015-04-01 12:04:42
Message-ID: CAM3TTh11=r78zuRFkQzpRwtqWq9LFzQSUgwxmmk+1DC5t85hmQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Let's hope they wake up and fix it. If not it's going to be time to pull
the plug and go else where.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Adam Rothschild <asr@latency.net> wrote:

> It is trivial to verify that congestion exists between 701-2914,
> without getting into any information which would be covered by NDA.
>
> Without providing editorial commentary, I'd not expect any upgrades
> any time soon either, due to traffic ratios and neither party wanting
> to budge.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:19:58PM -0400, Dovid Bender wrote:
> >> Is anyone seeing issues between NTT and Verizon FiOS? It seems like NTT
> >> knows about the issue and is in a round about way blaming Verizon saying
> >> the base of the issue is non technical but because of the NDA they can't
> >> discuss.
> >
> > Yeah, that seems to be the new way to annoy customers.  Sign peering
> > agreements under a NDA that does not even permit telling customers where
> > or *what* the problem is.
> >
> > We've had that with NTT and DTAG, and I'm still waiting for our AM to
> > come back with an official statement...
> >
> > (Now I'm all willing to blaim Verizon and DTAG for this crap, but the
> > whole approach to non-solving technical issues stinks)
> >
> > gert
> >
> > --
> > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> >                                                            //
> www.muc.de/~gert/
> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert@greenie.muc.de
> > fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> > _______________________________________________
> > Outages-discussion mailing list
> > Outages-discussion@outages.org
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">Let&#39;s hope they wake up and fix it. If not it&#39;s going to be \
time to pull the plug and go else where.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Adam Rothschild <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:asr@latency.net" \
target="_blank">asr@latency.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">It is trivial to verify that congestion exists between \
701-2914,<br> without getting into any information which would be covered by NDA.<br>
<br>
Without providing editorial commentary, I&#39;d not expect any upgrades<br>
any time soon either, due to traffic ratios and neither party wanting<br>
to budge.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Gert Doering &lt;<a \
href="mailto:gert@greenie.muc.de">gert@greenie.muc.de</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt; Hi,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:19:58PM -0400, Dovid Bender wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; Is anyone seeing issues between NTT and Verizon FiOS? It seems like NTT<br>
&gt;&gt; knows about the issue and is in a round about way blaming Verizon saying<br>
&gt;&gt; the base of the issue is non technical but because of the NDA they \
can&#39;t<br> &gt;&gt; discuss.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Yeah, that seems to be the new way to annoy customers.   Sign peering<br>
&gt; agreements under a NDA that does not even permit telling customers where<br>
&gt; or *what* the problem is.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; We&#39;ve had that with NTT and DTAG, and I&#39;m still waiting for our AM \
to<br> &gt; come back with an official statement...<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; (Now I&#39;m all willing to blaim Verizon and DTAG for this crap, but the<br>
&gt; whole approach to non-solving technical issues stinks)<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; gert<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --<br>
&gt; USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!<br>
&gt;                                                                                  \
//<a href="http://www.muc.de/~gert/" target="_blank">www.muc.de/~gert/</a><br> &gt; \
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                                            <a \
href="mailto:gert@greenie.muc.de">gert@greenie.muc.de</a><br> &gt; fax: <a \
href="tel:%2B49-89-35655025" value="+498935655025">+49-89-35655025</a>                \
<a href="mailto:gert@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de">gert@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de</a><br>
 </div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">&gt; \
_______________________________________________<br> &gt; Outages-discussion mailing \
list<br> &gt; <a href="mailto:Outages-discussion@outages.org">Outages-discussion@outages.org</a><br>
 &gt; <a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion" \
target="_blank">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion</a><br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>



_______________________________________________
Outages-discussion mailing list
Outages-discussion@outages.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic