[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: outages-discussion
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] [outages] 1-28-2014 - AT&T outage in Maryland area
From: Bill McGonigle <flowerpt () gmail ! com>
Date: 2014-01-28 20:13:01
Message-ID: CAONB_-+2Aqp59EWCQjD2V-j5rxpKq-024Y=H5Uc6j-Ga3X2EQA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On 01/28/2014 02:25 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> We won't even discuss the fact "OC192's" is possessive, while "OC192s"
> is plural.
It depends on which style guide is your bible (and there are holy wars
about those) [1]. The old rule was that all initialisms, acronyms,
abbreviations (especially mixed class), numbers and single letters got an
apostrophe to disambiguate the pluralizing 's'. So, Luke is using
historically correct style.
More commonly, these days, if an abbreviation has become a word, the
apostrophe is omitted if the apostrophe does not help to disambiguate (most
confusing in mixed case - QoSs or QoS's). This is somewhat
audience-dependent - OC192 could be a noun to many of us.
Our lingo is so full of these that I use the apostrophe when I think it
will help avoid confusion. Context can help.
-Bill
[1]
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/55970/plurals-of-acronyms-letters-numbers-use-an-apostrophe-or-not
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><div class=""><img class="" id=":um" \
src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif" alt=""></div><div \
dir="ltr"><div class="im">On 01/28/2014 02:25 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore \
wrote:<br><br>> We won't even discuss the fact "OC192's" is \
possessive, while "OC192s"<br> > is plural.<br><br></div>It
depends on which style guide is your bible (and there are holy wars
about those) [1]. The old rule was that all initialisms, acronyms,
abbreviations (especially mixed class), numbers and single letters got
an apostrophe to disambiguate the pluralizing 's'. So, Luke is using
historically correct style.<br>
<br>More commonly, these days, if an abbreviation has become a word, the
apostrophe is omitted if the apostrophe does not help to disambiguate
(most confusing in mixed case - QoSs or QoS's). This is somewhat
audience-dependent - OC192 could be a noun to many of us.<br>
<br>Our lingo is so full of these that I use the apostrophe when I think it will help \
avoid confusion. Context can help.<br><br>-Bill<br><br><br>[1] <a \
href="https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/55970/plurals-of-acronyms-letters-numbers-use-an-apostrophe-or-not" \
target="_blank">https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/55970/plurals-of-acronyms-letters-numbers-use-an-apostrophe-or-not</a></div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div>
_______________________________________________
Outages-discussion mailing list
Outages-discussion@outages.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic