[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: outages-discussion
Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] Anyone aware of problems around Chicago
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck ! nether ! net>
Date: 2009-05-01 14:12:53
Message-ID: 1B27E0EA-BD94-4939-B1FC-793CD59040DD () puck ! nether ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On May 1, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>> Please do not reply to my request with something terse -- take the
>> time
>> to explain, technically, why ICMP time exceeded (type 11) should be
>> altogether blocked or de-prioritised.
>
> As hard as it may be to believe, I don't know how to make it
> sufficiently wordy....
>
> The reasons you give, as preached by consultants, instructors, and
> such, coupled with a large population of PFY's who have no idea --
> "Its always been like that".
>
>> Then again, maybe this is a better discussion for NANOG.
>
> Seems like I got chased off of NANOG for that.
>
Do not fear the vocal minority.
I've been saying for years that it feels like everything is off-topic
for nanog. I think the challenge is keeping it relevant. There is a
community feedback forum for your concerns about nanog, including the
nanog-futures list and a steering committee (which I happen to sit on)
that are always willing to hear your feedback.
- Jared
_______________________________________________
Outages-discussion mailing list
Outages-discussion@outages.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic