[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       outages-discussion
Subject:    Re: [Outages-discussion] Anyone aware of problems around Chicago
From:       Jared Mauch <jared () puck ! nether ! net>
Date:       2009-05-01 14:12:53
Message-ID: 1B27E0EA-BD94-4939-B1FC-793CD59040DD () puck ! nether ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


On May 1, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:

> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>> Please do not reply to my request with something terse -- take the  
>> time
>> to explain, technically, why ICMP time exceeded (type 11) should be
>> altogether blocked or de-prioritised.
>
> As hard as it may be to believe, I don't know how to make it  
> sufficiently wordy....
>
> The reasons you give, as preached by consultants, instructors, and  
> such, coupled with a large population of PFY's who have no idea --  
> "Its always been like that".
>
>> Then again, maybe this is a better discussion for NANOG.
>
> Seems like I got chased off of NANOG for that.
>

Do not fear the vocal minority.

I've been saying for years that it feels like everything is off-topic  
for nanog.  I think the challenge is keeping it relevant.  There is a  
community feedback forum for your concerns about nanog, including the  
nanog-futures list and a steering committee (which I happen to sit on)  
that are always willing to hear your feedback.

	- Jared
_______________________________________________
Outages-discussion mailing list
Outages-discussion@outages.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic