[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       oss-security
Subject:    Re: [oss-security] Thousands of vulnerabilities, almost no CVEs: OSS-Fuzz
From:       Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen () simple ! dallas ! tx ! us>
Date:       2019-06-25 14:51:02
Message-ID: alpine.GSO.2.20.1906250946080.7899 () scrappy ! simplesystems ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Tue, 25 Jun 2019, Matthew Fernandez wrote:

> I'm probably telling you things you already know and it sounds like 
> you don't consider such issues worth addressing, but I just wanted 
> to point out that these are not theoretical. These cause real 
> problems for users and, for open source software, you may not have 
> full control over what toolchain/flags users build your code with.

I think that almost all bugs are issues worth addressing given 
sufficent resources available to address them.  The issue discussed is 
what proportion of bugs discovered via automated testing and claimed 
to be "security" issues based on computer analysis are exploitable 
vulnerabilities which deserve a CVE.

A good point has been made that Linux heap memory allocation behavior 
may be very different than other OSs and that behavior can also be 
hardware-specific.

Bob
-- 
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
Public Key,     http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/public-key.txt

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]