[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       oss-security
Subject:    Re: [oss-security] CVE request: another glibc flaw, similar to CVE-2013-1914, but in AF_INET6
From:       Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat ! com>
Date:       2013-10-23 1:59:07
Message-ID: 52672D6B.6010708 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/22/2013 04:42 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
> It was found that the CVE-2013-1914 fix in glibc for AF_UNSPEC
> missed a an identical case but with AF_INET6.  Could a CVE be
> assigned to this? This issue has the same impact as CVE-2013-1914.
> 
> References:
> 
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-10/msg00733.html 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022280
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Please use CVE-2013-4458 for this issue.

- -- 
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
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=BHAT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]