[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       oss-security
Subject:    [oss-security] Hardening the linker (was Re: [oss-security] CVE request: CouchDB insecure library lo
From:       Tim Brown <timb () nth-dimension ! org ! uk>
Date:       2010-08-29 15:10:48
Message-ID: 201008291611.20457.timb () nth-dimension ! org ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]


For those of you that missed it, this was actually reported by Dan off the back 
of a blog post by me describing the generic case:

http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/blog.php?id=87

I'm well aware that the linker is a tool and that it can be misused (as in 
this case) but is anyone aware of a good reason why empty directory 
specifications in LD_LIBRARY_PATH, PATH et al are treated as $PWD?  The only 
times I've seen empty specifications it's because of bugs such as the one Dan 
has reported.

Is there a case to look at harding the dynamic linker to reject empty 
specifications; there's not much that one can do where someone has explicitly 
set a stupid LD_LIBRARY_PATH?  I appreciate that this might has some unwanted 
outcomes (such as breaking compatibility with other POSIX-alike OS) but 
sometimes there's a good argument for breaking compatibility if it increases 
security (some of the various grsec kernel and GCC compiler hardening changes 
would be good examples here).

Tim
-- 
Tim Brown
<mailto:timb@nth-dimension.org.uk>
<http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/>

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]