[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: osgeo-discuss
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Call for Papers for FOSS4G 2013 Academic Track
From: Massimiliano Cannata <massimiliano.cannata () supsi ! ch>
Date: 2013-01-28 17:35:17
Message-ID: CAMKYQEuidjD7A649B9b6vWXYQST+=K=u_27pq53zHnpB6KenRQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Hi all,
I step back too.
I don't want to rise problems or whatever, and I think that LOC can decide
what they think is better, and.... after all its their conference ;-)
I have already clearly stated my point of view, and I have just to add that
in Denver the Journal was the same that is proposed for Nottingam (TGIS)
and in my opinion publishing 6 months after the conference is not a drama.
My little 1 cents..
Maxi
but just remind that the conference of Sept. 2013 in my opinion should
present work done in 2013 an
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Jeff McKenna <jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com
> wrote:
> Hi Jo,
>
> Indeed I fully agree with you.
>
> There seemed to be some confusion on past vs present. My goal was only
> to clear that up.
>
> I'll step back and let the Academic committee decide on all that.
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
> On 13-01-28 10:59 AM, Jo Cook wrote:
> > Hi Jeff and the rest of the list,
> >
> > I'm speaking from a position of ignorance about this, but surely the
> > academic track submission process will need to change from year to year
> > depending on the journal that papers are to be submitted to? Surely the
> > process is driven mainly by the demands and deadlines of the journal,
> > rather than any arbitrary date chosen by a committee?
> >
> > I think the only way you could set the dates and process in stone would
> > be to guarantee publication in the same journal each year (as well as
> > the OSGeo journal).
> >
> > Happy to be corrected on any of these points though!
> >
> > Jo
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Jeff McKenna
> > <jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com <mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Here's another thought for our "lessons learned" wiki: For the next
> > FOSS4G event, the first step in the Academic submission process
> could be
> > an "extended abstract" due for something like Feb 1st. How I am
> coming
> > up with that idea? On this past Friday was a deadline for a
> "CoastGIS"
> > event, and all presentation abstracts were to follow an "extended"
> > abstract template (min 2 pages max 4 pages, including listing your
> > peer-reviewed sources); selected extended abstracts will be invited
> to
> > submit full papers. Could this be the first step someday for a
> FOSS4G
> > Academic track? I've leave that to the FOSS4G Academic leaders to
> > discuss (again I am not one of those leaders).
> >
> > For the record here was the "extended" abstract template (sorry for
> the
> > M$ file, I have no relation to this event):
> >
> http://coinatlantic.ca/coastgis2013/docs/CoastGIS_2013_Extended_Abstract_Template.doc
> >
> > Thanks for listening.
> >
> > -jeff
> >
> >
> >
> > On 13-01-27 11:49 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> > > Hello Barend, Venka, Andy, Max, Nick, and Puneet,
> > >
> > > First I want to thank the Academic chairs Barend and Franz-Josef
> for
> > > volunteering for the management of the difficult process of the
> > > selection of papers for the FOSS4G 2013 event. I am impressed by
> > their
> > > passion and dedication to getting papers published in the
> Transactions
> > > in GIS journal, this is very important.
> > >
> > > I want to make a strong reminder to all of the FOSS4G 2013 local
> > > committee (academic or otherwise) to make sure to be adding to your
> > > "Lessons Learned" wiki page as you travel down this path (the time
> > to be
> > > adding thoughts is now not later when you have forgotten: as a
> > > documenter, I know those that say "oh I'll do that later" never
> > ever do,
> > > ever). Please begin writing your thoughts for 2013 at:
> > > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2013_Lessons_Learned You will
> > notice
> > > that is is blank for 2013. These thoughts are very important to
> > share,
> > > as future local committees will be reviewing these (take a look at
> all
> > > the wonderful lessons learned from previous events linked from that
> > > page, really wonderful to have). Thank you, and future event
> > committees
> > > will thank you.
> > >
> > > Regarding the Academic track call for papers for 2013, of course
> > we must
> > > respect the local committees decisions. I am listening to Barend's
> > > thoughts, as well as long-time FOSS4G academic leaders like Venka
> and
> > > Massimiliano. I feel that the 2013 committee could consider their
> > > feedback, and possibly extend the deadline by a month to March
> > 1st. It
> > > would give researchers some breathing room to prepare their papers,
> > > which, yes is earlier than past FOSS4G events but if we all want
> > papers
> > > within these journals we must respect these early deadlines. Of
> > course
> > > the local committee doesn't have to make an extension, I am only
> > making
> > > a suggestion.
> > >
> > > Another idea, or reminder, I have for the committee is to be as
> > open as
> > > possible; for example, there is a mailing list setup just for
> FOSS4G
> > > Academic discussions (I believe this was probably last used in
> > 2010, but
> > > it is there to discuss openly with academic FOSS4G leaders).
> Again,
> > > there is no official requirement for local committees to use these
> > > mailing lists.
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g-academic
> > >
> > > Finally, I just now went back to examine the FOSS4G 2011 Academic
> > Track
> > > process used. In fact that year I was also on the Academic
> Selection
> > > committee, which was led wonderfully by the hard-working Rafael
> > Moreno.
> > > On February 1st a "Call for Papers" was released for the Academic
> > > track, and the call was actually for abstracts (yes google
> > archives can
> > > trick you sometimes, as the title was for "Call for Papers" but if
> you
> > > read the release the first step was abstract submission). The
> > deadline
> > > for academic abstracts was April 15th. We received approximately
> 60
> > > academic abstracts (note that the day before the deadline, on April
> > > 14th, we only had 9 submissions so far - Paul Ramsey would be
> nodding
> > > his head at this, as this is very common, the many submitted right
> at
> > > the deadline). Rafael then instructed us to have our abstract
> > rankings
> > > back to him by May 16th. From those rankings the plan was: the
> > top 11 +
> > > 2 (backup) were invited to submit a paper for TGIS; the next 11 + 2
> > > (backup) were invited to submit a paper for the OSGeo Journal.
> > > According to my email archives the deadline for those full papers
> was
> > > July 30th; and we received a total of 17 full papers. The rest
> > > (history) should be discussed on the FOSS4G Academic list with the
> > > academic leaders (I am not one), but I hope this little history
> > summary
> > > helps the 2013 committee move forward.
> > >
> > > Again thanks for the hard work of the 2013 local committee.
> > >
> > > And thank you all for your FOSS4G passion (Puneet was right to put
> it
> > > all in perspective).
> > >
> > > -jeff
> > > OSGeo President
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13-01-25 7:26 AM, b.j.kobben@utwente.nl
> > <mailto:b.j.kobben@utwente.nl> wrote:
> > >> Dear Venka and Massimiliano,
> > >>
> > >> I feel we have to defend the Foss4G2013 AT a bit here (as AT
> > co-chairs we
> > >> should ;-)
> > >>
> > >> It is actually not true that "Previous FOSS4G's had abstract
> > review by the
> > >> academic committee
> > >> and selected authors were asked to submit full papers closer to
> the
> > >> conference dates."
> > >> Both in the 2010 and 2011 conferences we had submission of full
> > papers,
> > >> not abstracts.
> > >>
> > >> The reason for this is that academics nowadays need to publish,
> > if we want
> > >> or not, and that means we have to offer a possibility of official
> > >> publishing for the AT papers. The only way to achieve that is
> > have journal
> > >> outlets secured well beforehand and for that you need to set up a
> > "Journal
> > >> Type" submission and reviewing system, which means selection of
> full
> > >> papers. Having to first select promising abstract, then ask these
> > people
> > >> to write full papers, and then have these properly peer-reviewed,
> all
> > >> before the conference publication deadline, would mean we'd need
> > an even
> > >> earlier deadline.
> > >> This by the way is nowadays accepted academic practice at
> > conferences that
> > >> offer Jopurnal publication outputs.
> > >>
> > >> I agree that 7 months before the conference seems like a very
> early
> > >> deadline, but for the reviewing process, the editing and
> > processing of
> > >> accepted papers and preparation of manuscripts for publication, it
> > >> actually is quite a tight time table. Note that the advantage is
> > that if
> > >> your paper is accepted, you are assured of it being actually
> > published at
> > >> the conference date, something may academics are keen for...
> > >>
> > >> Note also that the normal (non AT) tracks at Foss4G continue to
> offer
> > >> submission and reviewing based on abstracts.
> > >>
> > >> We will have this year (as in previous years) an Academic
> > Committee. These
> > >> are the people that will be asked to do the full paper reviewing,
> > and we
> > >> have just this week invited candidates and have asked them to
> > agree to do
> > >> this important task. The list will appear on the site once the
> > reviewing
> > >> process starts.
> > >>
> > >> I hope this answers some of your questions.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> For further questions, comments and remarks, please don't
> hesitate to
> > >> contact the Academic Track co-chairs:
> > >>
> > >> * Franz-Josef Behr (Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences):
> > >> franz-josef.behr@hft-stuttgart.de
> > <mailto:franz-josef.behr@hft-stuttgart.de>
> > >> * Barend Köbben (ITC-University of Twente): kobben@itc.nl
> > <mailto:kobben@itc.nl>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
--
*Massimiliano Cannata*
Professore SUPSI in ingegneria Geomatica
Responsabile settore Geomatica
Istituto scienze della Terra
Dipartimento ambiente costruszione e design
Scuola universitaria professionale della Svizzera italiana
Campus Trevano, CH - 6952 Canobbio
Tel. +41 (0)58 666 62 14****
Fax +41 (0)58 666 62 09****
massimiliano.cannata@supsi.ch
*www.supsi.ch/ist*
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
Hi all,<div>I step back too. </div><div>I don't want to rise problems or \
whatever, and I think that LOC can decide what they think is better, and.... after \
all its their conference ;-)</div><div><br></div><div>I have already clearly stated \
my point of view, and I have just to add that in Denver the Journal was the same that \
is proposed for Nottingam (TGIS) and in my opinion publishing 6 months after the \
conference is not a drama.</div> <div><br></div><div>My little 1 \
cents..</div><div>Maxi</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> but just remind that \
the conference of Sept. 2013 in my opinion should present work done in 2013 \
an<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Jeff McKenna \
<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com" \
target="_blank">jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"> Hi Jo,<br>
<br>
Indeed I fully agree with you.<br>
<br>
There seemed to be some confusion on past vs present. My goal was only<br>
to clear that up.<br>
<br>
I'll step back and let the Academic committee decide on all that.<br>
<br>
-jeff<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 13-01-28 10:59 AM, Jo Cook wrote:<br>
> Hi Jeff and the rest of the list,<br>
><br>
> I'm speaking from a position of ignorance about this, but surely the<br>
> academic track submission process will need to change from year to year<br>
> depending on the journal that papers are to be submitted to? Surely the<br>
> process is driven mainly by the demands and deadlines of the journal,<br>
> rather than any arbitrary date chosen by a committee?<br>
><br>
> I think the only way you could set the dates and process in stone would<br>
> be to guarantee publication in the same journal each year (as well as<br>
> the OSGeo journal).<br>
><br>
> Happy to be corrected on any of these points though!<br>
><br>
> Jo<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Jeff McKenna<br>
</div>> <<a href="mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com">jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com</a> \
<mailto:<a href="mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com">jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com</a>>><br>
<div><div class="h5">> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Here's another thought for our "lessons learned" wiki: For \
the next<br> > FOSS4G event, the first step in the Academic submission process \
could be<br> > an "extended abstract" due for something like Feb \
1st. How I am coming<br> > up with that idea? On this past Friday was a \
deadline for a "CoastGIS"<br> > event, and all presentation \
abstracts were to follow an "extended"<br> > abstract template (min \
2 pages max 4 pages, including listing your<br> > peer-reviewed sources); \
selected extended abstracts will be invited to<br> > submit full papers. \
Could this be the first step someday for a FOSS4G<br> > Academic track? \
I've leave that to the FOSS4G Academic leaders to<br> > discuss (again I \
am not one of those leaders).<br> ><br>
> For the record here was the "extended" abstract template (sorry \
for the<br> > M$ file, I have no relation to this event):<br>
> <a href="http://coinatlantic.ca/coastgis2013/docs/CoastGIS_2013_Extended_Abstract_Template.doc" \
target="_blank">http://coinatlantic.ca/coastgis2013/docs/CoastGIS_2013_Extended_Abstract_Template.doc</a><br>
><br>
> Thanks for listening.<br>
><br>
> -jeff<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On 13-01-27 11:49 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:<br>
> > Hello Barend, Venka, Andy, Max, Nick, and Puneet,<br>
> ><br>
> > First I want to thank the Academic chairs Barend and Franz-Josef \
for<br> > > volunteering for the management of the difficult process of \
the<br> > > selection of papers for the FOSS4G 2013 event. I am impressed \
by<br> > their<br>
> > passion and dedication to getting papers published in the \
Transactions<br> > > in GIS journal, this is very important.<br>
> ><br>
> > I want to make a strong reminder to all of the FOSS4G 2013 local<br>
> > committee (academic or otherwise) to make sure to be adding to your<br>
> > "Lessons Learned" wiki page as you travel down this path (the \
time<br> > to be<br>
> > adding thoughts is now not later when you have forgotten: as a<br>
> > documenter, I know those that say "oh I'll do that later" \
never<br> > ever do,<br>
> > ever). Please begin writing your thoughts for 2013 at:<br>
> > <a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2013_Lessons_Learned" \
target="_blank">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2013_Lessons_Learned</a> You \
will<br> > notice<br>
> > that is is blank for 2013. These thoughts are very important to<br>
> share,<br>
> > as future local committees will be reviewing these (take a look at \
all<br> > > the wonderful lessons learned from previous events linked from \
that<br> > > page, really wonderful to have). Thank you, and future \
event<br> > committees<br>
> > will thank you.<br>
> ><br>
> > Regarding the Academic track call for papers for 2013, of course<br>
> we must<br>
> > respect the local committees decisions. I am listening to \
Barend's<br> > > thoughts, as well as long-time FOSS4G academic leaders \
like Venka and<br> > > Massimiliano. I feel that the 2013 committee could \
consider their<br> > > feedback, and possibly extend the deadline by a \
month to March<br> > 1st. It<br>
> > would give researchers some breathing room to prepare their papers,<br>
> > which, yes is earlier than past FOSS4G events but if we all want<br>
> papers<br>
> > within these journals we must respect these early deadlines. Of<br>
> course<br>
> > the local committee doesn't have to make an extension, I am \
only<br> > making<br>
> > a suggestion.<br>
> ><br>
> > Another idea, or reminder, I have for the committee is to be as<br>
> open as<br>
> > possible; for example, there is a mailing list setup just for \
FOSS4G<br> > > Academic discussions (I believe this was probably last used \
in<br> > 2010, but<br>
> > it is there to discuss openly with academic FOSS4G leaders). \
Again,<br> > > there is no official requirement for local committees to use \
these<br> > > mailing lists.<br>
> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g-academic" \
target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g-academic</a><br> > \
><br> > > Finally, I just now went back to examine the FOSS4G 2011 \
Academic<br> > Track<br>
> > process used. In fact that year I was also on the Academic \
Selection<br> > > committee, which was led wonderfully by the hard-working \
Rafael<br> > Moreno.<br>
> > On February 1st a "Call for Papers" was released for the \
Academic<br> > > track, and the call was actually for abstracts (yes \
google<br> > archives can<br>
> > trick you sometimes, as the title was for "Call for Papers" \
but if you<br> > > read the release the first step was abstract \
submission). The<br> > deadline<br>
> > for academic abstracts was April 15th. We received approximately \
60<br> > > academic abstracts (note that the day before the deadline, on \
April<br> > > 14th, we only had 9 submissions so far - Paul Ramsey would be \
nodding<br> > > his head at this, as this is very common, the many \
submitted right at<br> > > the deadline). Rafael then instructed us to \
have our abstract<br> > rankings<br>
> > back to him by May 16th. From those rankings the plan was: the<br>
> top 11 +<br>
> > 2 (backup) were invited to submit a paper for TGIS; the next 11 + 2<br>
> > (backup) were invited to submit a paper for the OSGeo Journal.<br>
> > According to my email archives the deadline for those full papers \
was<br> > > July 30th; and we received a total of 17 full papers. The \
rest<br> > > (history) should be discussed on the FOSS4G Academic list with \
the<br> > > academic leaders (I am not one), but I hope this little \
history<br> > summary<br>
> > helps the 2013 committee move forward.<br>
> ><br>
> > Again thanks for the hard work of the 2013 local committee.<br>
> ><br>
> > And thank you all for your FOSS4G passion (Puneet was right to put \
it<br> > > all in perspective).<br>
> ><br>
> > -jeff<br>
> > OSGeo President<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On 13-01-25 7:26 AM, <a \
href="mailto:b.j.kobben@utwente.nl">b.j.kobben@utwente.nl</a><br> \
</div></div><div><div class="h5">> <mailto:<a \
href="mailto:b.j.kobben@utwente.nl">b.j.kobben@utwente.nl</a>> wrote:<br> > \
>> Dear Venka and Massimiliano,<br> > >><br>
> >> I feel we have to defend the Foss4G2013 AT a bit here (as AT<br>
> co-chairs we<br>
> >> should ;-)<br>
> >><br>
> >> It is actually not true that "Previous FOSS4G's had \
abstract<br> > review by the<br>
> >> academic committee<br>
> >> and selected authors were asked to submit full papers closer to \
the<br> > >> conference dates."<br>
> >> Both in the 2010 and 2011 conferences we had submission of full<br>
> papers,<br>
> >> not abstracts.<br>
> >><br>
> >> The reason for this is that academics nowadays need to publish,<br>
> if we want<br>
> >> or not, and that means we have to offer a possibility of \
official<br> > >> publishing for the AT papers. The only way to achieve \
that is<br> > have journal<br>
> >> outlets secured well beforehand and for that you need to set up \
a<br> > "Journal<br>
> >> Type" submission and reviewing system, which means selection \
of full<br> > >> papers. Having to first select promising abstract, then \
ask these<br> > people<br>
> >> to write full papers, and then have these properly peer-reviewed, \
all<br> > >> before the conference publication deadline, would mean \
we'd need<br> > an even<br>
> >> earlier deadline.<br>
> >> This by the way is nowadays accepted academic practice at<br>
> conferences that<br>
> >> offer Jopurnal publication outputs.<br>
> >><br>
> >> I agree that 7 months before the conference seems like a very \
early<br> > >> deadline, but for the reviewing process, the editing \
and<br> > processing of<br>
> >> accepted papers and preparation of manuscripts for publication, \
it<br> > >> actually is quite a tight time table. Note that the \
advantage is<br> > that if<br>
> >> your paper is accepted, you are assured of it being actually<br>
> published at<br>
> >> the conference date, something may academics are keen for...<br>
> >><br>
> >> Note also that the normal (non AT) tracks at Foss4G continue to \
offer<br> > >> submission and reviewing based on abstracts.<br>
> >><br>
> >> We will have this year (as in previous years) an Academic<br>
> Committee. These<br>
> >> are the people that will be asked to do the full paper \
reviewing,<br> > and we<br>
> >> have just this week invited candidates and have asked them to<br>
> agree to do<br>
> >> this important task. The list will appear on the site once the<br>
> reviewing<br>
> >> process starts.<br>
> >><br>
> >> I hope this answers some of your questions.<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> For further questions, comments and remarks, please don't \
hesitate to<br> > >> contact the Academic Track co-chairs:<br>
> >><br>
> >> * Franz-Josef Behr (Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences):<br>
> >> <a \
href="mailto:franz-josef.behr@hft-stuttgart.de">franz-josef.behr@hft-stuttgart.de</a><br>
</div></div>> <mailto:<a \
href="mailto:franz-josef.behr@hft-stuttgart.de">franz-josef.behr@hft-stuttgart.de</a>><br>
<div class="im">> >> * Barend Köbben (ITC-University of Twente): <a \
href="mailto:kobben@itc.nl">kobben@itc.nl</a><br> </div>> <mailto:<a \
href="mailto:kobben@itc.nl">kobben@itc.nl</a>><br> <div class="HOEnZb"><div \
class="h5">><br> ><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" \
target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><b \
style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12px">Massimiliano \
Cannata</b><br><p style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<span style="color:gray;font-size:9pt">Professore SUPSI in ingegneria \
Geomatica</span></p><p \
style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span \
style="color:gray;font-size:9pt">Responsabile settore Geomatica</span></p> <p \
style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span \
style="color:gray;font-size:9pt"><br></span></p><p \
style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<span style="color:gray;font-size:9pt">Istituto scienze della Terra</span></p><p \
style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"></p><p \
style="margin:0px"> <span lang="IT" style="font-size:9pt;color:gray">Dipartimento \
ambiente costruszione e design</span></p><p \
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial;font-size:small;margin:0px"><span lang="IT" \
style="font-size:12px"><font color="#808080" face="arial, sans-serif">Scuola \
universitaria professionale della Svizzera italiana</font></span></p> <p \
style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:arial;font-size:small;margin:0px"><span \
style="color:gray;font-size:9pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif">Campus Trevano, \
</span><span style="color:gray;font-size:9pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif">CH - 6952 \
Canobbio</span></p> <p></p><p \
style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span \
lang="IT" style="font-size:9pt;color:gray">Tel. +41 (0)58 666 62 \
14<u></u><u></u></span></p> <p \
style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span \
lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9pt;color:gray">Fax +41 (0)58 666 62 \
09<u></u><u></u></span></p><p \
style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9pt"><a \
href="mailto:massimiliano.cannata@supsi.ch" \
target="_blank">massimiliano.cannata@supsi.ch</a></span></p><p \
style="margin:0px;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<u><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9pt;color:blue"><span style="color:blue"><a \
href="http://www.supsi.ch/ist" \
target="_blank">www.supsi.ch/ist</a></span></span></u></p> </div>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic