[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       osgeo-discuss
Subject:    Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] pycsw Receives OGC Compliance Certification and Reference Implementation Status
From:       Raj Singh <raj () rajsingh ! org>
Date:       2013-01-15 17:20:50
Message-ID: D98B9ABF-BB31-4074-AC61-0F0AB8C2ED56 () rajsingh ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Andrea, the RI policies have changed a bit in the last few years so it's worth taking \
a read through that new policy document and/or contacting Luis at OGC for \
                clarification.
---
Raj


On Jan 15, at 4:33 AM, Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Wondering, what steps did you follow to have pycsw also become a reference
> > implementation?
> > I thought the RI where chosen only while developing the CITE tests for a
> > particular standard, but the CSW 2.0.2 tests
> > have been out for a while
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Andrea
> > 
> 
> Thank you Andrea :)
> 
> We contacted OGC about compliance testing and we followed the documented \
> procedures: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=49237
> 
> Regarding RI, I am not aware of such time limitation during CITE test development.
> On our side what we did was ask kindly to get a review of the project and the \
> source code in order to be considered for RI. I do not know what internal processes \
> of OGC were triggered from this, but it seems we did well on our review. 
> Cheers,
> Angelos

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]