[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       osdl-lsb-discuss
Subject:    Re: [lsb-discuss] LSB 3.1 market penetration?
From:       "Marc Miller" <mmiller () spikesource ! com>
Date:       2008-07-03 17:54:19
Message-ID: 56B56647280147BFA32F5D6A9D200A48 () mmillerlaptop
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


They may, if they want to rely on LSB 3.1.  Enough LSB 3.0-compliant
operating systems are still in use that would make an ISV try to stick with
LSB 3.0 and not worry about LSB 3.1 quite yet.  At least, that was my
employer's initial take on this.

-----Original Message-----
From: lsb-discuss-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
[mailto:lsb-discuss-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Dan
Kegel
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 11:21 AM
To: lsb-discuss
Subject: [lsb-discuss] LSB 3.1 market penetration?

ISVs who might like to rely on LSB 3.1 might well ask:
  What percent of users are now running a LSB 3.1-compliant distribution?
and/or
   Are all pre-LSB-3.1 distribution releases now at end of life?

https://www.linuxfoundation.org/lsb-cert/productdir.php?by_lsb
has some nice info on which distributions are compliant with which LSB.
(It's missing Fedora, though, and it's missing Suse 10.2.)  It would be
interesting to add an end-of-life date column to that page.

Is there any better source of data on this question?
- Dan
_______________________________________________
lsb-discuss mailing list
lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss


["smime.p7s" (application/x-pkcs7-signature)]

_______________________________________________
lsb-discuss mailing list
lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]