[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openvz-debian
Subject:    [Debian] Re: [klinkov@yandex.ru: Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS]
From:       klinkov () yandex ! ru (=?koi8-r?B?89TBzsnTzMHX?=)
Date:       2011-05-04 3:00:10
Message-ID: 496161297358210 () web105 ! yandex ! ru
[Download RAW message or body]

10.02.2011, 19:12, "maximilian attems" <max@stro.at>:
> > ?Are you talking about the http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1626?
> 
> looks like.
Yes, it is the clue.

> > ?As I see now this was a misunderstanding between our developer and the
> > ?bug reporter.
Affirmative. I beg the OpenVZ developers pardon. Your parallel version system and \
production technology are really too complex for such an unsophisticated user as me.

> thank you for pushing this fix forward.
Thanks to you all, gentlemen.

The following is personally to Maximilian.

> have you tested vanilla 2.6.32 from debian, does that work for you?
Sorry, but vanilla kernel does not support OpenVZ features, so I doesn't make sense \
to speak about the mentioned bug number 1626.

And what is your conclusion about the CIFS problem? I remind that OpenVZ modification \
of 2.6.32 kernel is shipped with an old version of cifs module, being incompatible \
with mount.cifs userspace utility from Squeeze. At the same time vanilla 2.6.32 from \
debian works allright with cifs. Should I describe this bug in Debian's bugzilla?


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]