[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openvswitch-discuss
Subject:    [ovs-discuss] Issue with Broadcast Group
From:       C_Venkataraghavan () DELL ! com (C_Venkataraghavan at DELL ! com)
Date:       2015-06-24 0:55:26
Message-ID: F7F9C3835CC5DD4B95CDEB03319E713816ECFF9B () KULX10HMDC101 ! APAC ! DELL ! COM
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks Ben.  I've removed the watermark on this mail.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:blp at nicira.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:55 PM
To: Venkataraghavan, C
Cc: Ramalingham, Kavitha; bugs at openvswitch.org; K, Kalaiselvi; Sindagi, Rajesh; \
                Balasubram, Vasanthan; Manivasagam, Mahesh
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Issue with Broadcast Group

I hope you realize that bugs at openvswitch.org is a public mailing list.
Nothing on it can be confidential.

Yes. This is a property of how OpenFlow is defined.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:01:24PM +0000, C_Venkataraghavan at DELL.com wrote:
> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
> Hi Ben,
> If we use group type "indirect" instead of "all", multiple egress ports in output \
> action would still fail, right? 
> thanks
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:blp at nicira.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:22 PM
> To: Ramalingham, Kavitha
> Cc: bugs at openvswitch.org; K, Kalaiselvi; Sindagi, Rajesh;
> Venkataraghavan, C; Balasubram, Vasanthan; Manivasagam, Mahesh
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Issue with Broadcast Group
> 
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:42:33PM +0530, Kavitha_Ramalingham at Dell.com wrote:
> > I tested with the below mentioned topology, having a broadcast flow
> > whose actions were set to broadcast group ID. When I tried to ping
> > from host h1 to h2, ARP request packet is sent out to only one port
> > and not to all ports. We have created a group of type "all" with the
> > egress ports set to port3 and port4. The expectation here is that
> > any flow that uses this group has to egress the traffic on both the ports.
> > In the below tcpdump capture you can see that ARP-Request traffic
> > goes out of port4 and not thro' port3.
> 
> Your "all" group has one bucket with two output actions. That's a mistake, because \
> OpenFlow says that the actions in a bucket are an "action set", meaning that only \
> one action of each type can be effective. The solution is to use two buckets, each \
> with one output action.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150624/21af3878/attachment-0001.html>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]