[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openvswitch-discuss
Subject: [ovs-discuss] discuss Digest, Vol 52, Issue 96
From: 303429515 () qq ! com (=?gb18030?B?j4ik1Zxq?=)
Date: 2013-10-25 1:14:41
Message-ID: tencent_3AD105810C30D72713C48DD9 () qq ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
If I set one port "mod-port no-flood",then the seted port itself can not send ARP \
broadcast.this leads to the port can not communicate to others.
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "discuss-request";<discuss-request@openvswitch.org>;
Date: Fri, Oct 25, 2013 00:49 AM
To: "discuss"<discuss at openvswitch.org>;
Subject: discuss Digest, Vol 52, Issue 96
Send discuss mailing list submissions to
discuss at openvswitch.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
discuss-request at openvswitch.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
discuss-owner at openvswitch.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. 802.1Q Conformance (Vivek Saxena)
2. how to use ovs to controll one port's forward ( ??? )
3. Error with the number of flows reported by OVS (Sahil4 S)
4. Re: how to use ovs to controll one port's forward (Alex Wang)
5. Re: Error with the number of flows reported by OVS (Ben Pfaff)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:07:06 -0400
From: Vivek Saxena <vikvirt at gmail.com>
Subject: [ovs-discuss] 802.1Q Conformance
To: discuss at openvswitch.org
Message-ID:
<CAJaQUEEpwcycK7v5Gmcn517SP+kw2XJarNCE2SSZŒZZOcynA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
Has OVS been tested by anyone for conformance with 802.1Q ?
Please tell me how can I rate it on 802.1Q compliance.
Thanks,
Vivek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131024/cc05a3d5/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:10:59 +0800
From: " ??? " <303429515 at qq.com>
Subject: [ovs-discuss] how to use ovs to controll one port's forward
To: " discuss " <discuss at openvswitch.org>
Message-ID: <tencent_514B18955065AE24134D7A16 at qq.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb18030"
Hi,guys.
I have one quesstion.
Recently,I need this requirement. when ovs's one port receive broadcast \
packet(such as ARP broadcast),it does not forward the broadcast to other ports which \
beyond to one bridge. Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131024/747636ef/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:07:06 +0530
From: Sahil4 S <sahil4.s at tcs.com>
Subject: [ovs-discuss] Error with the number of flows reported by OVS
To: discuss at openvswitch.org
Message-ID:
<OFE7E72372.B003F0CE-ON65257C0E.00504D32-65257C0E.00504D38 at tcs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All,
I am working with the OVS version - 2.0.9 and I am facing the following issue:
I issues a FLOW_MOD command to delete all the flows and then verified with the \
following command on the switch side:
abc at abc-ThinkCentre-M91P:~/oftest$ sudo ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0
NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
But, If I see the number of tables it shows the number of active flows in the table 0 \
as 7. Why is this discrepency?
Following is the output of the same:
abc at abc-ThinkCentre-M91P:~/oftest$ sudo ovs-ofctl dump-tables br0
OFPST_TABLE reply (xid=0x2): 254 tables
? 0: classifier: wild=0x3fffff, max00000, active=7
?????????????? lookup0, matched
? 1: table1? : wild=0x3fffff, max00000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
? 2: table2? : wild=0x3fffff, max00000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
? 3: table3? : wild=0x3fffff, max00000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
? 4: table4? : wild=0x3fffff, max00000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
? 5: table5? : wild=0x3fffff, max00000, active=0
?????????????? lookup=0, matched=0
........253 tables with 0 active flows.
Due to this when I for the stats, stats_reply message send me the no of active flows \
as 7 whereas I am expecting the number of flows to be 0 resulting in the failure of \
my test case.
My test cases which were passing earlier on version 1.4.0 are now failing on the new \
version. Is this the issue with the OVS code or I am missing something.
Please guide.
Thanks and Regards
?
Sahil Shah
IT Analyst
Tata Consultancy Services
Cell:- 09873552128
Mailto: sahil4.s at tcs.com
=====-----=====-----====Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131024/7301ff43/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:27:37 -0700
From: Alex Wang <alexw at nicira.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] how to use ovs to controll one port's
forward
To: ??? <303429515 at qq.com>
Cc: discuss <discuss at openvswitch.org>
Message-ID:
<CAArS4XW_=h9sHt7H_geszDEVALN+AzumsWsN1s+UiMGnyej0QA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hey Qi,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:10 AM, ??? <303429515 at qq.com> wrote:
> Hi,guys.
> I have one quesstion.
> Recently,I need this requirement. when ovs's one port receive
> broadcast packet(such as ARP broadcast),it does not forward the broadcast
> to other ports which beyond to one bridge.
You can use "mod-port no-flood" to achieve it.
Thanks,
Alex Wang,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131024/98012a6a/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:49:18 -0700
From: Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Error with the number of flows reported by
OVS
To: Sahil4 S <sahil4.s at tcs.com>
Cc: discuss at openvswitch.org
Message-ID: <20131024164918.GB3501 at nicira.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 08:07:06PM +0530, Sahil4 S wrote:
> I am working with the OVS version - 2.0.9 and I am facing the following issue:
>
> I issues a FLOW_MOD command to delete all the flows and then verified with the \
> following command on the switch side:
> abc at abc-ThinkCentre-M91P:~/oftest$ sudo ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0
> NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
>
> But, If I see the number of tables it shows the number of active flows
> in the table 0 as 7. Why is this discrepency?
You probably have a controller configured in in-band mode. In-band mode
uses a number of "hidden" flows.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
End of discuss Digest, Vol 52, Issue 96
***************************************
.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131025/fc4a6b89/attachment.htm>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic