[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openswan-users
Subject:    Re: [Openswan Users] unorthodox setup
From:       Paul Wouters <paul () xelerance ! com>
Date:       2006-06-21 16:31:54
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.63.0606211829300.8736 () tla ! xelerance ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Charles Tompkins wrote:

> Is there a way to setup an openswan gateway, for road warrior connections,
> that isn't the default routing gateway, just a member, of the protected
> subnet?

You'll have to mess around with NAT then, so packets get back to the
ipsec server instead of the real default gw.
Alternatively, use something like L2TP so the clients get a local IP.

> CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: This email including any attachments, contains
> confidential information belonging to the sender. It may also be
> privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other
> legal rules. This information is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents
> of this emailed information is strictly prohibited.  If you have
> received this email in error, please immediately notify us by
> reply email of the error and then delete this email immediately.

4 times the size of your question :P And the whole "strictly prohibited"
is nonsense too.

Paul
-- 
Building and integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]