[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openswan-users
Subject:    RE: [Openswan Users] Openswan & l2tp: no connection has been
From:       "Trevor Benson" <tbenson () a-1networks ! com>
Date:       2004-05-26 15:10:29
Message-ID: 4ABCA28992201C46BB98A542B9CBFBDD020C70 () a1-server01 ! A-1 ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces@lists.openswan.org [mailto:users-
> bounces@lists.openswan.org] On Behalf Of cbrea@hps.es
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 7:26 AM
> To: Users@lists.openswan.org
> Subject: [Openswan Users] Openswan & l2tp: no connection has been
> authorized
> 
> Hi all;
> 
> 	I have a problem configurating my Openswan ( The know "but no
> connection
> has been authorized") I think it could be caused with the NAT-T but im
> using Openswan 2.1.2 & Kernel 2.6.6 and have nothing for patch and all
> modules loaded ( I think... :S ).
> Just have tried with all ipsec.conf possible, but give me the same
> problem.
> If I need to do something with NAT-T please tell me what
> 
> there´s My barf file :  http://usuarios.lycos.es/ggolfos/ipsec.log
> 
> Thanks a lot to all.
> 
> 
> pd.- the roadwarrior is a Windows 2000 , Native client IPSEC/L2TP ,
> updated sp 4.
> 
> 
> My scenario is the following:
> 
> 172.26.0.10 - VPN Gateway
> 		|
> 		|
> ((((172.26.0.0/24  Office LAN))))
> 		|
> 172.26.0.1----  |
> 80.25.248.190-  |Router
> 		|
> 		|
> 	     Internet
> 		|
> 		|
> 	%any--Roadwarrior
> 	  (80.59.163.60)
> 

Do you still have a left or rightsubnet= for the roadwarrior side.  I think I was \
getting a message that mentioned the no connection has been authorized for x.x.y.y IP \
address.  I think it was being caused by me still having a subnet listed instead of \
just left/rightprotoports.

Trevor


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]