[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensuse-packaging
Subject:    Re: [opensuse-packaging] Re: Non-building packages in Science and Education to be removed
From:       Dave Plater <dplater.list () gmail ! com>
Date:       2019-01-04 7:30:26
Message-ID: a709c6fb-ca68-aad5-1bee-e6f85e04445e () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]



On 03/01/2019 11:09, Lars Vogdt wrote:
> Well, if someone would take over and fix these packages, I would totally agree with \
> you. And I accepted a lot of submit requests or even maintainer requests already. \
> The people behind these requests have my full respect and I'm very, very thankful \
> for the work and time they spent. 
> But deleting others work because you want to "clean up" (what? for which reason?) \
> is not the way to go in my eyes - and your arguments do not change my feeling. 
> 
> > Of course it would be a better solution to move these packages to a
> > separate (sub-)repository until someone gets around to fix and move
> > them back.
> As long as they are "build disabled", moving them "out of sight" makes no change \
> (and no sense) at all. 
> But in OBS, you could of course request a new project called: "my 100% working \
> packages" and start your work there. But, stop, isn't this project called Factory \
> already?;-) 
> 
IMHO the binaries should be wiped as well. Leaving the packages in plain 
view in a well known project there is more chance that someone would 
notice them and fix them up.
Regards
Dave P
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]