[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: opensuse-packaging
Subject: Re: [opensuse-packaging] SLE_15 vs SLE_15_backports
From: Adam Majer <amajer () suse ! de>
Date: 2018-08-16 12:52:25
Message-ID: befdd6b2-4cae-b85e-53f1-488548e291c1 () suse ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
On 08/13/2018 02:08 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> On 13 Aug 13:56, Peter Czanik wrote:
> >
> > # riemann does not compile on SLES
> > %if !0%{?is_opensuse}
> > %bcond_with riemann
> > %else
> > %bcond_without riemann
> > %endif
>
> Package Hub 15 now also defines is_opensuse for various reasons, but you can
> still detect it with the is_backports variable.
>
> Regards,
> ismail
>
This is getting more complicated.
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_cross_distribution_howto#Detect_a_distribution_flavor_for_special_code
This means that the openSUSE Leap 15.0 is not defined with
%if 0%{?sle_version} == 150000 && 0%{?is_opensuse}
but requires,
%if 0%{?sle_version} == 150000 && 0%{?is_opensuse} && !0%{is_backports}
But for Package Hub 12, is_opensuse is undefined?
And these various reasons that is_opensuse is defined for Package Hub 15
- is that to push people to submit missing bits to Package Hub 15?
- Adam
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic