[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: opensuse-factory
Subject: Re: openSUSE Release Engineering meeting 03.01.2024
From: Simon Lees <sflees () suse ! de>
Date: 2024-01-06 10:28:51
Message-ID: 6e1d2aee-8029-48e8-bc98-b3520a592384 () suse ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]
[Attachment #4 (text/plain)]
On 1/6/24 02:39, Axel Braun wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
>
> Am Freitag, 5. Januar 2024, 12:13:57 CET schrieb Simon Lees:
>
>
> > I'll disagree with Axel and say that there could be valid reasons why we
>
> > as a project would want a different logo and I believe that someone
>
> > could create a compelling case as to why we as a project should change
>
> > logo and present that to members.
>
>
> In fact, you agree.
I don't actually
> To quote myself:
>
> > Only if there is a certain reason, e.g. because it is burned or the
> scope of your business changes
>
>
> -> this could be the compelling case!
Well quoting what you said more fully
> You dont change an identity or brand just for the fun of it. Only if
> there is a certain reason, e.g. because it is burned or the scope of
> your business changes
>
> I see neither of these reasons for openSUSE
One could argue that the scope of "openSUSE" has moved from just being
the open part of SUSE to being a much more independent open source
project and one way to avoid confusion around this would be to change to
a different logo while keepign the same name as not a full rebrand. I'm
not 100% convinced I agree with this yet but I believe it is the case
being made and that its probably worth taking to the membership to hear
there opinions.
--
Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net
Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek
SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
["OpenPGP_signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic