[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: opensuse-factory
Subject: Re: openSUSE Release Engineering meeting 20.04.2022
From: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin () gmail ! com>
Date: 2022-04-20 11:56:32
Message-ID: CADo9pHgnjukA6MsstWqTA6389Js--D4nJqLL7y5ik0u6DKRLFA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hey!
Did read the notes now, could not attend live as its foss-north Online 2022
this week: https://foss-north.se/2022/ https://foss-north.se/ and attending
the local Linux conference in Gothenburg but Online for the third year in a
row hopefully it will be in person again in 2023
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 12:23 PM Lubos Kocman <lubos.kocman@suse.com> wrote:
> All meeting minutes can be found here:
> https://etherpad.opensuse.org/p/ReleaseEngineering-meeting
> Meeting is hosted here
> https://meet.opensuse.org/ReleaseEngineeringMeeting
>
> ## Attendees
> DocB, ddemaio, lkocman, DimStar, Dirk, maxlin, Maurizio (m4u)
>
> ## Leap
>
> Heads up !!! Update on SLE Next on project@
>
> https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/project@lists.opensuse.org/thread/N6TTE7ZBY7GFJ27XSDTXRF3MVLF6HW4W/
>
> TODAY (April 20th) at 15:00 is the code submission deadline for Leap
> 15.4 RC. Only bugfixes afterwards.
> https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Roadmap
> What about the backlog queue?
> We have to process all that arrived until ~15:00, we can't easily have
> different deadline than SLES 15 SP4 Public RC (also today).
>
> Ask from QA: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/109223
> Update description of job groups with insufficient description
>
> Leap 15.5 - we have to aim for very early planning announced
> Focusing on Leap Micro to SLE Micro migration in spare time
>
> * Having a discussion about existing migrated systems from CentOS 7 to
> Leap 15.X and how does Leap 15.5 being the last release and transition
> to ALP fits in. Users seem to be worried.
>
> We have several possible ways: provide SP6/SP7 updates to Leap, some
> nice offer to SLES migration (probably not an option for most), easy
> migration to ALP ... let's see what's possible and what not.
>
> * Traditional Leap user, and their journey after 2023.
>
>
> These are two scenarios that I'd like to have active discussion on ^
>
> ## openSUSE Tumbleweed
>
> WSL/Tumbleweeed - openQA somehow stopped working 9 months ago
> https://openqa.opensuse.org/group_overview/68 do we know why? This has
> been asked by Jose (Cloud/WSL QA)
>
> openSUSE:Factory build fail stats: 177 failed, 11 unresolvable (last
> week: 197/17)
> https://tinyurl.com/ysy4nnnz
>
> * Easter-weekend: Tumbleweed was rolling, but with very few inputs (the
> number of SRs was lower and could thus still be handled)
> * Kernel 5.17.2
> * Moved from LLVM13 to LLVM14
>
>
> ## Richard (Kubic/TW MicroOS)
>
> Not available
>
> Podman 4.0.x is in Factory
> Pods in Podman 4.0.x are currently broken, due to catatonit 0.1.7 not
> being in Factory. It's on the way, meanwhile rolling back is a valid
> workaround
> openQA tests for Pods in Podman is written, reviewed, just being held
> back until catatonit 0.1.7 lands in Factory
> Experimenting with MicroOS Desktop (GNOME) SelfInstalling images. If
> experiments go well, next step will be to use TIU for OS updates.
> Ultimately may obsolete the current YaST-based installation method for
> MicroOS.
> lkocman: should I file inclusion requests for Leap/SLE Micro?
> Richard: no plan to have it there as of now.
> Working on various interesting MicroOS research tracks:
> - kiwi-less/container first VM image building Status: POC
> - nerdctl support in toolbox Status: Broken prototype
> - buildkit and its limit as a container builder
> - TW-to-MicroOS conversion
> - curl-minimal and making it default (like Fedora) Status:
> Investigating
> - Re-arranging Factory so products like MicroOS can build with
> different PrjConf than Tumbleweed
> - MicroOS Desktop using TIU instead of transactional-update (ie.
> remove all individual rpm package management) (research not sure if
> it's worth updating docs yet)
> Please ping rbrown@suse.com if you are interested/have opinions on any
> of the above, feedback/thoughts/existing knowledge is welcome.
>
> ## Max
>
> * Deleted duplicated SLE package rebuilt in Backports project, there is
> exceptions of multibuild package, because some specific build flavor
> has enabled on openSUSE only
> * Look into rpmlint issue, while debugging I found that it seem to we
> did introduce entry to DBUSServices.WhiteList in the wrong format
> therefore whitelisting doesn't work for kpmcore and others, bsc#1198521
> * Tweaked openqa settings for disabling RNG device on upgrade tests for
> Leap
> * Build fail stats in Leap 15.4: 42 build fails, 0 unresolvables
> lkocman: I'll open individual bugs for remaining build failures.
>
> Max: looking into pending submissions on Staging
> lkocman: I'll re-check status of the SLE submissions prior the RC
> deadline.
>
> Santiago mentioned that he'll have more free cycles for Leap/openQA
> this week. I'll reach out to him regarding focus on the migration
> scenarios.
>
> ## Guillaume - Arm
>
> Not available
>
> Tumbleweed:
> * Factory:ARM recovered from GCC12 build failure. A new snapshot
> should go to openQA later today or tomorrow.
> * Upcoming GCC 12 tested for aarch64:
>
> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:dirkmueller:branches:openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7
>
> Leap 15.4:
> * aarch64:
> * Go compiler has been updated in SLE.
> https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1183043
> * armv7:
> * Enlightenment package still fails in rpmlint check (missing
> whitelist?): https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194047
> lkocman: will reach out to simotek and Wolfgang
> * scc product class looks wrong (Marina/Marcus) (for all non-intel
> arches). x86_64 has OPENSUSE-BETA while for the others the class is
> SLES-ARM64-BETA, SLES-PPC-BETA, SLES-Z-BETA.
> https://sd.suse.com/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/SD-82355 (Internal,
> Ticket with SCC team, team lead is aware of the request). Request is
> now resolved. (lkcoman: Correction trello shows me that 2/4 items are
> still pending).
>
> lkocman to check if we could remove the firefox tests from the
> 42.X/15.0 upgrade test suite. It doesn't seem to happen outside of that
> (same for TW).
> lkocman will try to look into this
>
> ## Sarah - s390x
>
> Not available
>
> Tumbleweed:
> * Is rolling
>
>
> openSUSE Leap Beta:
> * no issues at the moment
>
> * fakeroot updated, that it is buildable for s390x again
> * arpack-ng requires 12GB of memory for successful builds (constraints
> expanded)
>
> lkocman: slightly related topic, should we perhaps re-consider
> recommended memory amount in Release Notes? I think we still recommend
> something like 2G minimal / 4G or 8G optimal.
> * KDE for s390x adopted
>
> ## Doug
> * TSP
> * Temporary suspension of TSP until we can find a payment solution
> * Had meeting with accounts payable (need other experts on call)
> * Another meeting schedule for beginning of next week
> * oSC22
> * 108 registrations, 63 submissions, 39 hours
> * Approving talks
> * Have mock schedule and feedback from people on talk times
> * Catering offer recieved (hope to approve it this week)
> * Meeting today at Z-Bau
> lkocman: I'd really like to see a panel discussion with our ALP
> steering comittee on the conference (similar to Fedora in the past).
> * OSCAL oSC22
> * CfP goes until April 26
> * LAS talk next week about Leap Micro
> * GSoC is May 12 deadline
>
> Git Hub maintainer day/week? mentioned on the #oscc
>
> ## Dirk
>
> * switched obs-arm-11 worker to aio=io_uring away from aio=threads
> which appears to reduce I/O cost (bsc#1197746)
> * fixed file(1) speedup regression
> * Still to work rust 1.59 / ghc issues on armv6 and armv7: all have the
> same root cause, use of SWP/SWPB instructions which is imperfectly
> emulated by the aarch64 host kernel. works fine with armv6/v7 kernel.
>
> In backlog: https://code.opensuse.org/leap/features/issue/17
>
> ## Wolfgang (Package Hub), Scott Bahling
>
> Not available
>
> ## Maintenance team (Marina or Marcus, Maurizio (m4u))
>
> - Marcus: 15.4 is set up channel wise, updates will go in testing
> occasionaly, if you need more ping me, no openqa setup yet
> lkocman: could you please help me with cleanup of maintenance tasks in
> https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/opensuse-leap-15-4/issues/gantt
>
> - Marcus: 15.3 openQA is ok again.
>
> lkocman: (still pending) will open a release notes entry for a change
> Security Advisory identification
> TODO Marcus: could you give me example of old and new values?
>
> - Marina and Maurizio: SLE-PackageHub overlaps
> (https://github.com/openSUSE/openSUSE-release-process/issues/71) work
> in progress following the initial list of overlapping packages
> (https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/106610#note-3). More incidents
> are under QA. Work is going on and under control (and tracked
> internally as jsc#MSC-303).
> Already released: (AH PERFECT!)
> SUSE:Maintenance:22929:265929 (babl libbabl-0_1-0 typelib-1_0-Babl-0_1)
> SUSE:Maintenance:23000:266006 (MozillaThunderbird enigmail)
> SUSE:Maintenance:23009:266004 (freerdp freerdp-devel freerdp-proxy
> libfreerdp2 libgsm) -> libgsm1 was missing in PH making freerdp not
> installable
> SUSE:Maintenance:22928:266007 (argyllcms csync libcsync0 libcsync-
> plugin-sftp libcsync-plugin-smb
> Max alrady removed packages from Backports
> Maurizio: Most packages from the list for 15-SP3 on the ticket are now
> staged, waiting to be sent for QA testing. Update on status to come as
> soon as package updates are released but it will likely take time.
>
> Leap Micro 5.2 - Maintenance setup should be rather small, as we do
> override only branding.
> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Leap:Micro:5.2
>
> Lubos to open a progres-o-o ticket for the maintenance update. Marcus
> would also prefer as small overhead as possible. Adrian: we could have
> a policy that if there is an updated for Micro it should go only to the
> official code-stream even if the package didn't exist there yet.
>
> Raised by Marcus: removal of SUSEConnect in favor of suseconnect-ng
> lkocman: the obsoletes are set correctly, none of packages is installed
> by default. And installation of suseconnect-ng currently removes
> SUSEConnect. Documentation was updated accordingly. In my opinion this
> is already good enough.
> https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:How_to_migrate_to_SLE
>
> ## Adrian - OBS
>
> feedback loop on mirrored submissions doesn't workstation. Lubos wills
> end an email with an example to Marco and Adrian. (Sent last week)
>
>
>
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><div>Hey!</div><div><br></div><div>Did read the notes now, could not \
attend live as its foss-north Online 2022 this week: <a \
href="https://foss-north.se/2022/">https://foss-north.se/2022/</a> <a \
href="https://foss-north.se/">https://foss-north.se/</a> and attending the local \
Linux conference in Gothenburg but Online for the third year in a row hopefully it \
will be in person again in 2023 </div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div \
dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 12:23 PM Lubos Kocman <<a \
href="mailto:lubos.kocman@suse.com">lubos.kocman@suse.com</a>> \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">All meeting minutes \
can be found here:<br> <a \
href="https://etherpad.opensuse.org/p/ReleaseEngineering-meeting" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://etherpad.opensuse.org/p/ReleaseEngineering-meeting</a><br> \
Meeting is hosted here<br> <a \
href="https://meet.opensuse.org/ReleaseEngineeringMeeting" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://meet.opensuse.org/ReleaseEngineeringMeeting</a><br> <br>
## Attendees<br>
DocB, ddemaio, lkocman, DimStar, Dirk, maxlin, Maurizio (m4u)<br>
<br>
## Leap<br>
<br>
Heads up !!! Update on SLE Next on project@<br>
<a href="https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/project@lists.opensuse.org/thread/N6TTE7ZBY7GFJ27XSDTXRF3MVLF6HW4W/" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/project@lists.opensuse.org/thread/N6TTE7ZBY7GFJ27XSDTXRF3MVLF6HW4W/</a><br>
<br>
TODAY (April 20th) at 15:00 is the code submission deadline for Leap<br>
15.4 RC. Only bugfixes afterwards.<br>
<a href="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Roadmap" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Roadmap</a><br> What about the \
backlog queue?<br> We have to process all that arrived until ~15:00, we can't \
easily have<br> different deadline than SLES 15 SP4 Public RC (also today). <br>
<br>
Ask from QA: <a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/109223" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/109223</a><br> Update \
description of job groups with insufficient description<br> <br>
Leap 15.5 - we have to aim for very early planning announced<br>
Focusing on Leap Micro to SLE Micro migration in spare time<br>
<br>
* Having a discussion about existing migrated systems from CentOS 7 to<br>
Leap 15.X and how does Leap 15.5 being the last release and transition<br>
to ALP fits in. Users seem to be worried.<br>
<br>
We have several possible ways: provide SP6/SP7 updates to Leap, some<br>
nice offer to SLES migration (probably not an option for most), easy<br>
migration to ALP ... let's see what's possible and what not.<br>
<br>
* Traditional Leap user, and their journey after 2023.<br>
<br>
<br>
These are two scenarios that I'd like to have active discussion on ^<br>
<br>
## openSUSE Tumbleweed<br>
<br>
WSL/Tumbleweeed - openQA somehow stopped working 9 months ago<br>
<a href="https://openqa.opensuse.org/group_overview/68" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://openqa.opensuse.org/group_overview/68</a> do we know why? \
This has<br> been asked by Jose (Cloud/WSL QA)<br>
<br>
openSUSE:Factory build fail stats: 177 failed, 11 unresolvable (last<br>
week: 197/17)<br>
<a href="https://tinyurl.com/ysy4nnnz" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://tinyurl.com/ysy4nnnz</a><br> <br>
* Easter-weekend: Tumbleweed was rolling, but with very few inputs (the<br>
number of SRs was lower and could thus still be handled)<br>
* Kernel 5.17.2<br>
* Moved from LLVM13 to LLVM14<br>
<br>
<br>
## Richard (Kubic/TW MicroOS) <br>
<br>
Not available<br>
<br>
Podman 4.0.x is in Factory<br>
Pods in Podman 4.0.x are currently broken, due to catatonit 0.1.7 not<br>
being in Factory. It's on the way, meanwhile rolling back is a valid<br>
workaround<br>
openQA tests for Pods in Podman is written, reviewed, just being held<br>
back until catatonit 0.1.7 lands in Factory<br>
Experimenting with MicroOS Desktop (GNOME) SelfInstalling images. If<br>
experiments go well, next step will be to use TIU for OS updates.<br>
Ultimately may obsolete the current YaST-based installation method for<br>
MicroOS.<br>
lkocman: should I file inclusion requests for Leap/SLE Micro?<br>
Richard: no plan to have it there as of now.<br>
Working on various interesting MicroOS research tracks:<br>
- kiwi-less/container first VM image building Status: POC<br>
- nerdctl support in toolbox Status: Broken prototype<br>
- buildkit and its limit as a container builder<br>
- TW-to-MicroOS conversion<br>
- curl-minimal and making it default (like Fedora) Status: <br>
Investigating<br>
- Re-arranging Factory so products like MicroOS can build with<br>
different PrjConf than Tumbleweed<br>
- MicroOS Desktop using TIU instead of transactional-update (ie.<br>
remove all individual rpm package management) (research not sure if<br>
it's worth updating docs yet)<br>
Please ping <a href="mailto:rbrown@suse.com" target="_blank">rbrown@suse.com</a> if \
you are interested/have opinions on any<br> of the above, feedback/thoughts/existing \
knowledge is welcome.<br> <br>
## Max<br>
<br>
* Deleted duplicated SLE package rebuilt in Backports project, there is<br>
exceptions of multibuild package, because some specific build flavor<br>
has enabled on openSUSE only<br>
* Look into rpmlint issue, while debugging I found that it seem to we<br>
did introduce entry to DBUSServices.WhiteList in the wrong format<br>
therefore whitelisting doesn't work for kpmcore and others, bsc#1198521<br>
* Tweaked openqa settings for disabling RNG device on upgrade tests for<br>
Leap<br>
* Build fail stats in Leap 15.4: 42 build fails, 0 unresolvables<br>
lkocman: I'll open individual bugs for remaining build failures.<br>
<br>
Max: looking into pending submissions on Staging<br>
lkocman: I'll re-check status of the SLE submissions prior the RC<br>
deadline.<br>
<br>
Santiago mentioned that he'll have more free cycles for Leap/openQA<br>
this week. I'll reach out to him regarding focus on the migration<br>
scenarios.<br>
<br>
## Guillaume - Arm<br>
<br>
Not available<br>
<br>
Tumbleweed:<br>
* Factory:ARM recovered from GCC12 build failure. A new snapshot<br>
should go to openQA later today or tomorrow.<br>
* Upcoming GCC 12 tested for aarch64:<br>
<a href="https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:dirkmueller:branches:openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:dirkmueller:branches:openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc7</a><br>
<br>
Leap 15.4:<br>
* aarch64: <br>
* Go compiler has been updated in SLE.<br>
<a href="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1183043" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1183043</a><br>
* armv7: <br>
* Enlightenment package still fails in rpmlint check (missing<br>
whitelist?): <a href="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194047" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194047</a> \
<br> lkocman: will reach out to simotek and Wolfgang<br>
* scc product class looks wrong (Marina/Marcus) (for all non-intel<br>
arches). x86_64 has OPENSUSE-BETA while for the others the class is<br>
SLES-ARM64-BETA, SLES-PPC-BETA, SLES-Z-BETA.<br>
<a href="https://sd.suse.com/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/SD-82355" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://sd.suse.com/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/SD-82355</a> \
(Internal,<br> Ticket with SCC team, team lead is aware of the request). Request \
is<br> now resolved. (lkcoman: Correction trello shows me that 2/4 items are<br>
still pending).<br>
<br>
lkocman to check if we could remove the firefox tests from the<br>
42.X/15.0 upgrade test suite. It doesn't seem to happen outside of that<br>
(same for TW).<br>
lkocman will try to look into this<br>
<br>
## Sarah - s390x<br>
<br>
Not available<br>
<br>
Tumbleweed:<br>
* Is rolling<br>
<br>
<br>
openSUSE Leap Beta:<br>
* no issues at the moment<br>
<br>
* fakeroot updated, that it is buildable for s390x again<br>
* arpack-ng requires 12GB of memory for successful builds (constraints<br>
expanded)<br>
<br>
lkocman: slightly related topic, should we perhaps re-consider<br>
recommended memory amount in Release Notes? I think we still recommend<br>
something like 2G minimal / 4G or 8G optimal. <br>
* KDE for s390x adopted<br>
<br>
## Doug<br>
* TSP<br>
* Temporary suspension of TSP until we can find a payment solution<br>
* Had meeting with accounts payable (need other experts on call)<br>
* Another meeting schedule for beginning of next week<br>
* oSC22<br>
* 108 registrations, 63 submissions, 39 hours<br>
* Approving talks<br>
* Have mock schedule and feedback from people on talk times<br>
* Catering offer recieved (hope to approve it this week) <br>
* Meeting today at Z-Bau<br>
lkocman: I'd really like to see a panel discussion with our ALP<br>
steering comittee on the conference (similar to Fedora in the past).<br>
* OSCAL oSC22 <br>
* CfP goes until April 26<br>
* LAS talk next week about Leap Micro<br>
* GSoC is May 12 deadline<br>
<br>
Git Hub maintainer day/week? mentioned on the #oscc<br>
<br>
## Dirk<br>
<br>
* switched obs-arm-11 worker to aio=io_uring away from aio=threads<br>
which appears to reduce I/O cost (bsc#1197746)<br>
* fixed file(1) speedup regression<br>
* Still to work rust 1.59 / ghc issues on armv6 and armv7: all have the<br>
same root cause, use of SWP/SWPB instructions which is imperfectly<br>
emulated by the aarch64 host kernel. works fine with armv6/v7 kernel.<br>
<br>
In backlog: <a href="https://code.opensuse.org/leap/features/issue/17" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://code.opensuse.org/leap/features/issue/17</a><br>
<br>
## Wolfgang (Package Hub), Scott Bahling<br>
<br>
Not available<br>
<br>
## Maintenance team (Marina or Marcus, Maurizio (m4u))<br>
<br>
- Marcus: 15.4 is set up channel wise, updates will go in testing<br>
occasionaly, if you need more ping me, no openqa setup yet<br>
lkocman: could you please help me with cleanup of maintenance tasks in<br>
<a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/opensuse-leap-15-4/issues/gantt" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://progress.opensuse.org/projects/opensuse-leap-15-4/issues/gantt</a><br>
<br>
- Marcus: 15.3 openQA is ok again. <br>
<br>
lkocman: (still pending) will open a release notes entry for a change<br>
Security Advisory identification<br>
TODO Marcus: could you give me example of old and new values?<br>
<br>
- Marina and Maurizio: SLE-PackageHub overlaps<br>
(<a href="https://github.com/openSUSE/openSUSE-release-process/issues/71" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/openSUSE/openSUSE-release-process/issues/71</a>) \
work<br> in progress following the initial list of overlapping packages<br>
(<a href="https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/106610#note-3" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/106610#note-3</a>). More \
incidents<br> are under QA. Work is going on and under control (and tracked<br>
internally as jsc#MSC-303).<br>
Already released: (AH PERFECT!)<br>
SUSE:Maintenance:22929:265929 (babl libbabl-0_1-0 typelib-1_0-Babl-0_1)<br>
SUSE:Maintenance:23000:266006 (MozillaThunderbird enigmail)<br>
SUSE:Maintenance:23009:266004 (freerdp freerdp-devel freerdp-proxy<br>
libfreerdp2 libgsm) -> libgsm1 was missing in PH making freerdp not<br>
installable<br>
SUSE:Maintenance:22928:266007 (argyllcms csync libcsync0 libcsync-<br>
plugin-sftp libcsync-plugin-smb<br>
Max alrady removed packages from Backports<br>
Maurizio: Most packages from the list for 15-SP3 on the ticket are now<br>
staged, waiting to be sent for QA testing. Update on status to come as<br>
soon as package updates are released but it will likely take time.<br>
<br>
Leap Micro 5.2 - Maintenance setup should be rather small, as we do<br>
override only branding.<br>
<a href="https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Leap:Micro:5.2" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Leap:Micro:5.2</a><br>
<br>
Lubos to open a progres-o-o ticket for the maintenance update. Marcus<br>
would also prefer as small overhead as possible. Adrian: we could have<br>
a policy that if there is an updated for Micro it should go only to the<br>
official code-stream even if the package didn't exist there yet.<br>
<br>
Raised by Marcus: removal of SUSEConnect in favor of suseconnect-ng<br>
lkocman: the obsoletes are set correctly, none of packages is installed<br>
by default. And installation of suseconnect-ng currently removes<br>
SUSEConnect. Documentation was updated accordingly. In my opinion this<br>
is already good enough.<br>
<a href="https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:How_to_migrate_to_SLE" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:How_to_migrate_to_SLE</a><br> <br>
## Adrian - OBS <br>
<br>
feedback loop on mirrored submissions doesn't workstation. Lubos wills<br>
end an email with an example to Marco and Adrian. (Sent last week)<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic