[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensuse-factory
Subject:    Re: RFC: New devel project devel:languages:python:pyqt and deal with different SIP versions
From:       Ben Greiner <code () bnavigator ! de>
Date:       2021-04-14 12:46:24
Message-ID: 1d38bdb0-e295-1ef5-32c6-e41965bec1f5 () bnavigator ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello,

Am 23.02.21 um 12:04 schrieb Ben Greiner:
> On 23.02.21 11:57, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>>> Op 19-02-2021 om 20:48 schreef Ben Greiner:
>>>> python-sip, python-qt5 and co. have always been kind of a foreign 
>>>> body to C++ focused KDE:Qt5. May I propose to create 
>>>> devel:languages:python:pyqt and put related packages into that one? 
>>>> Maintainers could be python and QT/KDE people together.
>>
>> I generally applaud the idea: if somebody wants to enclose away some 
>> set of packages I don't have to care about, it is always a great idea 
>> to me. Especially, if she pulls away from my reach some packages from 
>> d:l:p which I won't have to care about.
>>
>> The question remains however, whether it should be more d:l:p:pyqt or 
>> whether it should be KDE:Qt:Python (or something like that).
>
> Even as d:l:p:pyqt with additional maintainers from KDE your workload 
> is lightened, correct? I personally would prefer that over 
> KDE:Qt:Python because the KDE:* tree is a labyrinth to me.

If I am not mistaken, everybody seems to be in favor of a new project. 
The demo home:bnavigator:pyqt has been ready for about 2 months. Could 
the maintainers of d:l:p and KDE(:Qt) please come to an agreement where 
to put it and then create the project?

As mentioned before, I would favor devel:languages:python:pyqt. I 
volunteer to participate in maintaining the project, but of course it is 
at the discretion of the existing maintainers.

Regards,
Ben

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]