[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensuse-factory
Subject:    Re: [opensuse-factory] O Factory - Where art Thou?
From:       Jos Poortvliet <jos () opensuse ! org>
Date:       2013-11-28 17:15:46
Message-ID: 1755254.r3A49V5vGd () linux-606j
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 28 November 2013 16:33:19 Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar 
wrote:
> Quoting Adrian Schröter <adrian@suse.de>:
> > Am Donnerstag, 28. November 2013, 16:18:57 schrieb Dominique
> > 
> > Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar:
> >> Quoting Adrian Schröter <adrian@suse.de>:
> >> > My hope is that we can developer some kind of objective QA
> >> > measurements
> >> > in future for this. Eg. X server is not only compiling, but even
> >> 
> >> starting :)
> >> 
> >> > Or bluez update does not break the tools for one of the desktops like
> >> > it
> >> > is even the case for openSUSE:13.1 released version.
> >> 
> >> Please, stop using this example! This was CONSCIOUSLY decided, HERE on
> >> the Factory mailing lists.
> > 
> > Well, I do not want to spoil this discussion with that, but it comes to
> > the point where we need to define our quality criterias before and
> > follow them.
> > 
> > And such criterias must be objective and should not be driven by
> > current technical
> > problems if we want to have the user acceptance.
> 
> I didn't say it was necessary the *right* decision.. I only stated it
> was a conscious one. And as such defeated by all those automatics.

Yeap, and while it might have been painful, it is woefully off-topic here, so 
let's move on indeed ;-)

These threads are already growing big and hairy as-is...

/J

> Dominique

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]