[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensuse-factory
Subject:    Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: KDE 4.9 is now in Tumbleweed:Testing,
From:       Greg KH <gregkh () linux ! com>
Date:       2012-11-20 20:58:36
Message-ID: 20121120205836.GA12989 () kroah ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:35:07PM +0100, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:30 -0800, Greg KH wrote: 
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:46:08PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 11/20/2012 07:25 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > I do not know of any way to resolve this, does anyone else?
> > > 
> > > Maybe we can redefine release number to have precedence over others
> > > and testing to have a bit lower than real tumbleweed. prjconf like
> > > this should do this (untested):
> > > In tumbleweed:
> > > Release: tw1.<CI_CNT>.<B_CNT>
> > > in tumblweed:testing:
> > > Release: tw0.<CI_CNT>.<B_CNT>
> > > 
> > > Hmm, but then adding whatever is in tumbleweed into tumbleweed:testing
> > > wouldn't dup packages from testing. Oh, testing should have higher
> > > priority when people have testing enabled. So the above the other way
> > > round?
> > 
> > Either way would help out when I have updated packages in tumbleweed,
> > yet because of the build number being lower than what is in the 12.2
> > repo, they never get updated.
> 
> CAREFUL:
> 
> prefixing the 'release' tag with tw will ALLWAYS make it lower than
> 12.2...
> 
> 1.0-1 > 1.0-tw7.15
> 
> So you wouldn't win anything to what you have now (well, you would win
> consistency.. all packages would always have a lower release and only
> the version number would ever be considered).

Ah, good point, no, we don't want that to happen.

So that isn't going to work, any other suggestions?

thanks,

greg k-h
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]