[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensuse-factory
Subject:    Re: [opensuse-factory] The frustration of updating
From:       Peter Poeml <poeml () suse ! de>
Date:       2009-02-17 17:46:04
Message-ID: 20090217174604.GY14919 () suse ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:05:09PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> 
> > Am Dienstag 27 Januar 2009 schrieb Richard Guenther:
> > >
> > > I assume files have "full" names including version and build.  So why
> > > not just keep old files around so that old meta-data does not get
> > > invalidated by partial updates?
> > 
> > "Why not just"? It's 14G without source and debuginfo. How many of those
> > copies do you think our mirrors would prefer to have?
> 
> I hope it will be a lot less if we improve on not syncing out identical
> packages.  But, indeed - "just".  It's useful to be able to revert
                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> a package to a previously known good state as well.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That's a good point indeed. I would be nice to arrange delayed deletion
of packages in a way that there's always one previous package version.
Would be highly convenient for manual repair of breakage.

Peter
-- 
Contact: admin@opensuse.org (a.k.a. ftpadmin@suse.com)
         #opensuse-mirrors on freenode.net
Info: http://en.opensuse.org/Mirror_Infrastructure
 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Research & Development

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]