[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensuse
Subject:    Re: suspicious packages? libicu-suse65_1 and other icu stuff? no current changelog in installed paca
From:       "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty () suddenlinkmail ! com>
Date:       2021-03-31 8:51:32
Message-ID: 0b46e15d-60e2-7762-6693-ae6dfed42e75 () suddenlinkmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 3/30/21 4:25 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:11:07AM +0200, cagsm wrote:
> > Hello list,
> > 
> > is there something wrong with select packages that are being pushed
> > out onto the user base of opensuse?
> > 
> > 2021-03-29 23:17:13|install|libicu65_1-ledata|65.1-lp152.3.3.1|noarch||update-openSUSE-Leap-oss|4e193919a16d495b20446cd5c67bed9037870d1d8e65cea6ab856ee1278565a7|
> >  
> > 2021-03-29 23:17:18|install|libicu-suse65_1|65.1-lp152.3.3.1|x86_64||update-openSUSE-Leap-oss|1e7771fe36ce8974c7ad0334c0a5d3154c29d469450572b812c5c96914a12d84|
> >  
> > 2021-03-29 23:17:20|install|libicu-devel|65.1-lp152.3.3.1|x86_64||update-openSUSE-Leap-oss|65becc9cf7973632f2633342418932df42c3e827f2dd93dcf00d428bdeac774c|
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > last changelog inside these rpm is from may 2020 (may twenty twenty)
> > and i fail to find any of these icu stuff being announced on the
> > updates list mailings archive?
> > 
> > i wonder how i can trust such packages?
> 
> The icu packages were part of the LibreOffice update set.
> 
> You are right, there was actually no source diff in this release,
> I think it might have been needed only for rebuild or some other reason.
> 
> But nothing specifically to worry about.
> 
> Ciao, Marcus
> 

Only thing I've seen icu pulled into is harfbuzz-icu which I think is used
with php in some form or fashion. It almost never changes -- but when it does,
you have to recompile php to update the library dependencies...

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]