[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openssl-users
Subject:    RE: nasm vs. masm
From:       "Edward Chan" <edchan () adobe ! com>
Date:       2007-07-25 12:32:41
Message-ID: 06D3935708FAE242A5FDFB708B5F391E037C5AB0 () namail4 ! corp ! adobe ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Cool.  I figured you guys are mostly testing with nasm so that's what
I'm using.  But I was just curious if anybody has done any benchmark
tests to see whether one assembler generated more efficient assembly
than the other that would result in noticeably better performance.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openssl-users@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
> users@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:22 AM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: nasm vs. masm
> 
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007, Edward Chan wrote:
> 
> > Anybody have any idea which assembler is preferred when building
with
> > VC8?
> >
> 
> Currently you can use either but in future nasm will be the only
supported
> assembler. This is the case with 0.9.9-dev.
> 
> Steve.
> --
> Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
> OpenSSL project core developer and freelance consultant.
> Funding needed! Details on homepage.
> Homepage: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                           majordomo@openssl.org
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majordomo@openssl.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]