[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openssl-cvs
Subject:    Re: cvs commit: openssl STATUS
From:       Bodo Moeller <3moeller () informatik ! uni-hamburg ! de>
Date:       1999-04-29 16:19:23
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 04:01:17PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:

>>                                               My proposal
>> #define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT    "OpenSSL 0.9.2c (development version)"
>> is to be read as "version 0.9.2c, which is a development version",
>> not "a development version that is to become 0.9.2c".

> OK, but that means you end up skipping versions, which is what I wanted
> to avoid.

Whether this results in skipping depends on the point of view.  If we
plan that release version numbers should not have a suffix letter, but
development versions do, then the sequence of version numbers from
releases will not have any visible gaps (0.9.3, 0.9.4, 0.9.5 ...).
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
CVS Repository Commit List                     openssl-cvs@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majordomo@openssl.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]