[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openssh-unix-dev
Subject:    Re: X448 Key Exchange
From:       "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri () ll ! mit ! edu>
Date:       2018-09-21 14:22:36
Message-ID: 0F2EDDDF-F7BD-4B8D-BAA9-937958B7BF2B () ll ! mit ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

Frankly, I'd much rather see PKCS#11 support for EC keys integrated.

— 
Regards,
Uri

On 9/21/18, 8:58 AM, "openssh-unix-dev on behalf of Damien Miller" \
<openssh-unix-dev-bounces+uri=ll.mit.edu@mindrot.org on behalf of djm@mindrot.org> \
wrote:

    On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Joseph S. Testa II wrote:
    
    > Hmm... crickets.  Does this imply that X448 in OpenSSH is not ever a 
    > possibility?
    
    I'm not sure what more to I can add.
    
    Like I said: none of us presently see the value of it outweighing the
    cost of having to support X448 and SHA3 in ~perpetuity.
    
    -d
    _______________________________________________
    openssh-unix-dev mailing list
    openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
    https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
    


["smime.p7s" (application/pkcs7-signature)]

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev

--===============0325760877565136800==--

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]