[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openssh-unix-dev
Subject:    Re: openssh vs pam
From:       Darren Tucker <dtucker () zip ! com ! au>
Date:       2005-06-25 23:38:11
Message-ID: 42BDEAE3.50503 () zip ! com ! au
[Download RAW message or body]

Damien Miller wrote:
> A bit of history here: when Sun first forked OpenSSH to make Sun_SSH,
> they offered us back their patchset, but steadfastly refused to state
> or clarify the license that it was under, thereby making direct
> cooperation impossible. Quite a pity really...

Some slightly more recent history: where code has been supplied by Sun 
(or anyone else for that matter) under a compatible license (ISC, 2 or 3 
term BSD) and there is a need for it, we are happy to use it.

For example, BSM audit support has been in the last couple of OpenSSH 
releases (audit-bsm.c), based on code supplied by Sun under a 2-term BSD 
license.

Now whether or not anyone actually uses it is another question.  I've 
seen no comments about it post-release.  Hopefully no news is good news...

-- 
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4  37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
     Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]