[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openssh-bugs
Subject:    [Bug 2038] permitopen functionality but for remote forwards
From:       bugzilla-daemon () mindrot ! org
Date:       2012-09-08 6:47:41
Message-ID: bug-2038-705-9qulthzoPb () https ! bugzilla ! mindrot ! org/
[Download RAW message or body]

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038

--- Comment #2 from proctor <damonswirled@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Some options:
> 
> 1. Separate option
> 
> PermitROpen 2000 2001 2002 3000-3999
> 
> 2. Reuse PermitOpen, but treat numbers without ':' as -R port numbers
> 
> PermitOpen 127.0.0.1:1234 2000 2001 2002 3000-3999
> 
> The advantage of (1) is that we can extend it to allow selection of
> bind address, but (2) can't do this...

from my point of view either one of these solutions would be _very_
welcome. although i don't require it at this moment, i can certainly
imagine scenarios where control over bind address would be valuable.
are there any drawbacks to option one?

sincerely,
proctor

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
_______________________________________________
openssh-bugs mailing list
openssh-bugs@mindrot.org
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]