[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensolaris-xen-discuss
Subject:    Re: [xen-discuss] Xen a good alternative for VMware ?
From:       Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2009-11-11 18:44:52
Message-ID: 570905.98187.qm () web56101 ! mail ! re3 ! yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Sorry, bad comprehension. Thanks for feed.
Kernels bellow have production quality:-

2.6.27 xenifed SLES 11 OpenSuse 11.1
2.6.29.6 xenified 

Next official Xen release is supposed to be out with JF's pvops  kernel (01/01/10)
no matter would it merge mainline linux or no.
Even in meantime 2.6.31.5 pvops is stable enough in QA environment.

--- On Wed, 11/11/09, Mark Johnson <Mark.Johnson@Sun.COM> wrote:

From: Mark Johnson <Mark.Johnson@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [xen-discuss] Xen a good alternative for VMware ?
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Vikram Hegde" <Vikram.Hegde@Sun.COM>, xen-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 1:33 PM



Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> > The linux dom0 kernels are (or at least have been) very old since they haven't, \
> > to date, > pushed dom0 support into the  upstream linux kernel.
> 
> Are you saying Xen Dom0 (pv_ops) support is already in upstream ?


No, I said that it hasn't been pushed.



MRJ




      


[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: \
inherit;">Sorry, bad comprehension. Thanks for feed.<br>Kernels bellow have \
production quality:-<br><br>2.6.27 xenifed SLES 11 OpenSuse 11.1<br>2.6.29.6 xenified \
<br><br>Next official Xen release is supposed to be out with JF's pvops&nbsp; kernel \
(01/01/10)<br>no matter would it merge mainline linux or no.<br>Even in meantime \
2.6.31.5 pvops is stable enough in QA environment.<br><br>--- On <b>Wed, 11/11/09, \
Mark Johnson <i>&lt;Mark.Johnson@Sun.COM&gt;</i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote \
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: \
5px;"><br>From: Mark Johnson &lt;Mark.Johnson@Sun.COM&gt;<br>Subject: Re: \
[xen-discuss] Xen a good alternative for VMware ?<br>To: "Boris Derzhavets" \
&lt;bderzhavets@yahoo.com&gt;<br>Cc: "Vikram Hegde" &lt;Vikram.Hegde@Sun.COM&gt;, \
xen-discuss@opensolaris.org<br>Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 1:33  \
PM<br><br><div class="plainMail"><br><br>Boris Derzhavets wrote:<br>&gt;&nbsp; &gt; \
The linux dom0 kernels are (or at least have been) very old since they haven't, to \
date, &gt; pushed dom0 support into the&nbsp; upstream linux kernel.<br>&gt; <br>&gt; \
Are you saying Xen Dom0 (pv_ops) support is already in upstream ?<br><br><br>No, I \
said that it hasn't been \
pushed.<br><br><br><br>MRJ<br><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>

      



_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
xen-discuss@opensolaris.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]