[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensolaris-mktg
Subject:    Re: [advocacy-discuss] CC Renewal Clarification
From:       Jim Grisanzio <Jim.Grisanzio () Sun ! COM>
Date:       2009-06-21 15:19:23
Message-ID: 4A3E4F7B.80809 () sun ! com
[Download RAW message or body]



Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Jim Grisanzio<Jim.Grisanzio@sun.com> wrote:
>   
>> When Community Groups renew their Core Contributor grants, does the OGB
>> expect that the CGs vote and that there be a record of that vote? Or do the
>> Facilitators simply check that the request is coming from a previous CC and
>> send it to the OGB for recording/updating? I can`t find where this process
>> is specified.
>>     
>
> I'm not sure this is written down anywhere, so I believe this to be unspecified.
> Advocacy is somewhat unique in having its own actual procedures for this, so
> if you don't know, then nobody will.
>   

Well, we have documentation for creating CCs but not for renewing them. :)

> However, most of the CC renewals I saw in the run-up to the most recent election
> did take the form of a proper vote, if that helps in establishing
> precedent. I don't
> think that simply requesting renewal and having it go through without
> any oversight
> isn't a good thing.
>
> I've created a suggestion for OGB 2008/009, which says basically:
>
> Procedures for renewal of Contributor and Core Contributor grants
> should be the same as for the initial grant. In particular, a vote
> under the same terms as the initial grant should still take place.
>   

I think this reasonable. If no one objects, I`ll add this concept to our 
processes.

Jim
-- 
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/
_______________________________________________
advocacy-discuss mailing list
advocacy-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy-discuss
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]