[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensolaris-mdb-discuss
Subject:    Re: [mdb-discuss] How I can interpret it : couldn't read xxx
From:       Jonathan Adams <jonathan.adams () sun ! com>
Date:       2008-09-03 21:14:33
Message-ID: 20080903211433.GB15578 () eng ! sun ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:43:30PM -0700, Valdemar Moreira Pavesi wrote:
> Adam,Jonathan
> 
> > ::findleaks -dv
> findleaks:                maximum buffers => 5538
> findleaks:                 actual buffers => 5167
> findleaks:
> findleaks:             potential pointers => 476621388
> findleaks:                     dismissals => 467057088     (97.9%)
> findleaks:                         misses => 9348415       ( 1.9%)
> findleaks:                           dups => 210725        ( 0.0%)
> findleaks:                        follows => 5160          ( 0.0%)
> findleaks:
> findleaks:              elapsed wall time => 32 seconds
> findleaks:
> BYTES             LEAKED         VMEM_SEG CALLER
> 8192                   7 fffffd7f937b7000 MMAP
> 16384                  1 fffffd7ffdf8d000 MMAP
> 4096                   1 fffffd7ffdee6000 MMAP
> 4096                   1 fffffd7ffdab8000 MMAP
> 4096                   1 fffffd7ffd1a9000 MMAP
> 4096                   1 fffffd7fa572e000 MMAP
> 4096                   1 fffffd7fa0ebe000 MMAP
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>            Total       7 oversized leaks, 45056 bytes
> 
> CACHE             LEAKED           BUFCTL CALLER
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>            Total       0 buffers, 0 bytes
> 
> mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7f937b7000, fffffd7f937b9000), 8192 bytes
> mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7ffdf8d000, fffffd7ffdf91000), 16384 bytes
> mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7ffdee6000, fffffd7ffdee7000), 4096 bytes
> mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7ffdab8000, fffffd7ffdab9000), 4096 bytes
> mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7ffd1a9000, fffffd7ffd1aa000), 4096 bytes
> mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7fa572e000, fffffd7fa572f000), 4096 bytes
> mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7fa0ebe000, fffffd7fa0ebf000), 4096 bytes
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks! So much for your help , I really apreciate.
> 
> 
> Every day we are finding a lot problems using MDB and DTRACE.

Great!  I'm investigating to see if ::findleaks can deal better with partial
cores.

Cheers,
- jonathan

_______________________________________________
mdb-discuss mailing list
mdb-discuss@opensolaris.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]