[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       opensolaris-discuss
Subject:    Re: [osol-discuss] powertop
From:       Aubrey Li <aubrey () opensolaris ! org>
Date:       2009-02-23 2:39:34
Message-ID: 6d6a94c50902221839g2e28e2adu522f6cd142b91d77 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Ignacio Marambio Catán
<darkjoker@gmail.com> wrote:
> i'll ask before filling a bug, has anyone seen powertop return something like
> nacho@saturn:~$ pfexec powertop
> OpenSolaris PowerTOP version 1.1   (C) 2008 Intel Corporation
>
> powertop: ../cpufreq.c : cpu-change-speed probe unavailable
> Collecting data for 5.00 second(s)
>
> After that all i see is
>                        OpenSolaris PowerTOP version 1.1
>
> Cn                      Avg     residency       P-states (frequencies)
> C0 (cpu running)                (32.4%) 1000 Mhz        -NaN%
> C1                      0.6ms   (67.6%)         1333 Mhz        -NaN%
>                                                1833 Mhz        -NaN%
>
> Wakeups-from-idle per second: 1109.7    interval: 5.2s
> Power usage (ACPI estimate): 0.001W (running on AC power, fully charged)
>
> Top causes for wakeups:
> 20.0% (222.1)               <kernel> :  genunix`cv_wakeup
>  9.6% (106.7)            <interrupt> :  i8042#0
>  9.0% (100.0)               <kernel> :  genunix`clock
>  5.3% ( 58.9)                  sched :  <cross calls>
>  2.3% ( 25.7)            <interrupt> :  wpi#0
>  1.4% ( 15.2)               <kernel> :  uhci`uhci_handle_root_hub_status_change
>  0.9% ( 10.1)               <kernel> :  ata`ghd_timeout
>  0.9% ( 10.1)               <kernel> :  genunix`delay_wakeup
>  0.9% ( 10.1)               <kernel> :  bfe`gem_mii_link_watcher
>
> which is not really informative
> It was working properly till i decided it was time to update some
> drivers which included  the bios and the dvd drive firmware
>
> nacho
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>

Assume this is on snv_107, the problem is gone on 108.

Thanks,
-Aubrey
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]