[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openoffice-discuss
Subject:    Re: [discuss] Buggy build 641C
From:       David Grant <david.grant () telus ! net>
Date:       2002-02-04 16:52:16
Message-ID: 3C5EBC40.3020103 () telus ! net
[Download RAW message or body]



Andreas Fehr wrote:

>On 2002-02-04, 10:05, Kevin B. Hendricks (as KBH) wrote:
>
>KBH> Hi,
>KBH>
>KBH> I disagree.  IMHO OO641C is the best build so far.  What makes you think
>KBH> it is less reliable than OO638?  On which platform?
>KBH>
>KBH> I have not seen one documented regression from OO638 to OO641C?
>KBH>
>KBH> Can you site some specific issues from Issuezilla you think are
>KBH> representative of the problems?
>KBH>
>
>From some mirror:
>
>Found in the contrib/german directory, so I don't known, whether it's
>related to the german build only...
>
>(Translation of the first 3 lines:
>641b is full functional, caution with 641c, the switch to gcc3 is not
>yet complete. ==> 641c is only for testing and development.)
>
That would probably be a good explanation as to why it is so crasheable. 
 Here are some very related Issues.  I found 3 + mine.  The last one

http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2984
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2946
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2910
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2563

What was described in 2946 has definitely happened to me before (which 
you can read about in 2910).  These errors are quite widespread and 
happen for a variety of reasons.

Is gcc 3.x used for Linux and Windows builds?  I'm just trying to figure 
out why my Linux 641c and Windows 641c both crash...

Thanks,
David Grant


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]