[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openldap-devel
Subject:    Re: ITS#5040, operational attribute updates
From:       Michael_Ströder <michael () stroeder ! com>
Date:       2007-07-24 23:09:26
Message-ID: 46A686A6.6000406 () stroeder ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> 
> In general, any change to the DIT object should result in a update of
> modifyTimestamp.  This is necessary for synchronization*
> purposes. 

Got the message.

> Regarding refint.  One should view these updates as coming from a user
> application embedded in the DSA, not from the
> directory service.  That is, the updates are not made as part of the
> directory update model, but part of an application
> update model.  That fact that its coded in the DSA is irrelevant.

Somewhat related: How about the value of modifiersName in this case?

Ciao, Michael.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]