[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openldap-devel
Subject:    Re: loglevel index intention?
From:       Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah () zimbra ! com>
Date:       2007-07-03 5:18:16
Message-ID: 1166183202.461183439896145.JavaMail.root () dogfood ! zimbra ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


----- "Howard Chu" <hyc@symas.com> wrote:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > I noticed that loglevel index is unused by anything currently, and I
> was
> > wondering what the intention was initially behind that loglevel. 
> There are
> > a number of back-bdb/hdb error messages that get generated around
> indices
> > that currently come out at the "any" level.  I thought perhaps index
> might
> > be better for them, but wasn't sure of the intent.
> 
> The practice has always been that real error messages are logged at
> ANY. The 
> finer grained levels are for informational messages.


Okay.  In the case I'm looking at, though, it isn't realy an error as there is no \
need for the attribute to actually be indexed, but it is still worthwhile to have in \
the filter. :/  I may just squelch it in the local build.

--Quanah


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]