[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject:    Re: RFR: 8307977: jcmd and jstack broken for target processes running with elevated capabilities
From:       Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf () openjdk ! org>
Date:       2024-01-31 10:06:02
Message-ID: E5_5vSbaWhWCPcsxxQCM1H26FFwVv2zwiRH00j6XDII=.126e8d7e-ff40-4794-a9c4-6cbce4ebcc39 () github ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:57:43 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@openjdk.org> wrote:

> > 8307977: jcmd and jstack broken for target processes running with elevated \
> > capabilities
> 
> `test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability` tests would also be worth running.

> Hi @jerboaa, thanks a lot for the hints! The container tests were new to me at \
> least. 
> Just out of curiosity, are the container tests run as part of the tier1 tests \
> (`make test-tier1`)? I'm not sure if I'm looking at the right place, but I get the \
> feeling this is defined in `test/hotspot/jtreg/TEST.groups`, and the answer is \
> maybe "no" in that case. 
> > Please run container tests, which do some jcmd testing across containers (host \
> > system runs jcmd and containers have the JVMs): `test/hotspot/jtreg/containers` \
> > See [testing.md](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/doc/testing.md#docker-tests) \
> > as to how to run them. I'll give this PR a spin as well.
> 
> If I understand it correctly, this is the way to run them. Please correct me if I'm \
> wrong. 
> ```
> $ make test TEST="jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg/containers"
> 
> ...
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
> TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
> jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg/containers                  14    14     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS
> ```

Thanks! Please make sure that the tests actually ran. If, for example, `docker` is \
not installed, they get skipped.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17628#issuecomment-1918774353


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]