[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject:    Integrated: 8299240: rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock can be safepoint
From:       Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn () openjdk ! org>
Date:       2023-02-21 21:25:40
Message-ID: geVOGNDGf2wRDUi9D3X59hMdJGGhaaPiArrJ2_D5Rfo=.e0b99964-acea-48ac-bbd0-1baa84e687a4 () github ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 05:37:51 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn@openjdk.org> wrote:

> The rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock is better to be safepoint instead of \
> nosafepoint. The fix includes removal of the function \
> `check_vthread_and_suspend_at_safepoint` which is not needed anymore. 
> Testing:
> mach5 jobs are in progress:
> Kitchensink, tiers1-6 (all JVMTI, JDWP, JDI and JDB tests have to be included)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 46f25250
Author:    Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn@openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/46f25250bd49702fe18f9903473dc3e1cbe70f84
                
Stats:     55 lines in 6 files changed: 10 ins; 32 del; 13 mod

8299240: rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock can be safepoint

Reviewed-by: dholmes, coleenp, pchilanomate

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12550


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]