[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject:    Re: RFR: 8253064: monitor list simplifications and getting rid of TSM [v6]
From:       Daniel D.Daugherty <dcubed () openjdk ! java ! net>
Date:       2020-11-12 21:47:06
Message-ID: vVxS2XNQsZNDQGRRAY5dvCkBDmbcqd1C0j7Ea9fJeLE=.d6687e35-ef7a-4fd5-9a9f-b638523d8464 () github ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:35:50 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcubed@openjdk.org> wrote:

> > I typically use size_t for entities that can scale with the size of the machine's \
> > memory, so I don't have to think about whether there are enough bits. Could \
> > AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate be uintx instead of intx? And then maybe we don't \
> > need to declare a range, as the natural range of the uintx seems perfectly valid.
> 
> I'm pretty sure I copied the decl for AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate
> from some other already existing option. That's SOP for me anyway...
> If we make any more changes here it will have to be in a follow up.

Filed the following new RFE:
    JDK-8256307 cleanup AvgMonitorsPerThreadEstimate and _in_use_list_ceiling types
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256307

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/642


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]