[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject: Re: RFR: 8246774: implementing Record Classes as a standard feature in Java [v3]
From: Vicente Romero <vromero () openjdk ! java ! net>
Date: 2020-09-30 14:50:40
Message-ID: 3HQG1K8tFl8GYpUnm_gbEH8MqTKMQ17fONGeb0m1RnE=.c74d767c-e371-471a-b963-944460e468f7 () github ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:54:14 GMT, Chris Hegarty <chegar@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > test/langtools/tools/javac/records/LocalStaticDeclarations.java line 33:
> >
> > > 31: * jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.util
> > > 32: * @build combo.ComboTestHelper
> > > 33: * @compile LocalStaticDeclarations.java
> >
> > This, and other, explicit at compile tags could be elided, no? The test source \
> > file will be implicitly compiled by the at run tag. I believe that the explicit \
> > at compile tag was added original so that the enable preview and source version \
> > options could be passed to javac - neither of which are needed any more.
>
> Does this test need an @run tag rather than an @compile tag ? ( the @run with \
> implicitly compile the source file, before running it )
yep u are right it could be removed, I will check all the instances of this, thanks
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/290
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic