[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject:    Re: RFR(XS): 8215966: GeneratePropertyPassword.sh uses bash syntax (was Re: [PATCH] JDK-8025886: Rep
From:       "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee () amazon ! com>
Date:       2018-12-28 23:20:42
Message-ID: 186DA688-7AAA-49C9-9CAF-BE82593BBAA7 () amazon ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

The change is Sergei's original proposal (not included in this message), but I'll \
take what I can get. :) Pushed.

Thanks,

Paul

On 12/28/18, 1:44 PM, "David Holmes" <david.holmes@oracle.com> wrote:

    Hi Paul,
    
    On 29/12/2018 4:05 am, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
    > I'll sponsor it. I've filed JDK-8215966 
    > <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215966> for it: it's a simple 
    > forward port.
    
    To be clear, it isn't that this change didn't make it into post 9, the 
    change was reverted by JDK-8192953 in June 2018.
    
    > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215966
    > 
    > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8215966/webrev.00/
    > 
    > While I agree with Martin that we might as well specify bash, imo in 
    > this specific case it's better to do a forward port since the code 
    > already exists in JDK9. The webrev therefore dups the JDK-8025886 
    > <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025886> patch. If we want to 
    > make scripts explicitly depend on bash, I'd prefer to see a separate RFE 
    > for it.
    
    The patch looks good to me. Reviewed.
    
    > Lgtm, so that's one review. May we have another please?
    
    Point of order: the change proposed is not the change that Sergei 
    requested a review of. This is new code proposed by you, so you can't 
    review your own contribution.
    
    But I've Reviewed it, and Sergei is okay with it too so that's a 
    "r"eview and so it is good to go.
    
    Thanks,
    David
    
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > 
    > Paul
    > 
    > *From: *serviceability-dev <serviceability-dev-bounces@openjdk.java.net> 
    > on behalf of Sergei Ustimenko <merkel05@gmail.com>
    > *Date: *Friday, December 28, 2018 at 8:40 AM
    > *To: *serviceability-dev <serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net>
    > *Subject: *Re: [PATCH] JDK-8025886: Replace [[ and == bash extensions in 
    > tests
    > 
    > Hi,
    > 
    > Could anyone please help with review?
    > 
    > Regards,
    > 
    > Sergei
    > 
    > On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 at 17:09, Sergei Ustimenko <merkel05@gmail.com 
    > <mailto:merkel05@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > 
    >     Hi,
    > 
    >     Could anyone please review and sponsor
    > 
    >     this small patch to add a shebang line to
    > 
    >     the test script?
    > 
    >     diff --git
    >     a/test/jdk/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh
    >     b/test/jdk/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh
    >     ---
    >     a/test/jdk/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh
    >     +++
    >     b/test/jdk/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh
    >     @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
    >     +#!/bin/bash
    >     +
    >       #
    >       # Copyright (c) 2003, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All
    >     rights reserved.
    >       # DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
    > 
    >     Thanks,
    > 
    >     Sergei
    > 
    >     On Wed, Dec 19, 2018, 21:04 Sergei Ustimenko <merkel05@gmail.com
    >     <mailto:merkel05@gmail.com> wrote:
    > 
    >         Quickfix on my previous mail: I've found no scripts
    > 
    >         with the same problem, except this one in the patch.
    > 
    >          >Yeah, let's fix !
    > 
    >         Perfect!
    > 
    >         I will just need some help with sponsorship to push this.
    > 
    >         I've signed the OCA, so no problems from my side.
    > 
    >         Regards,
    > 
    >         Sergei
    > 
    >         On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 20:22, Martin Buchholz
    >         <martinrb@google.com <mailto:martinrb@google.com>> wrote:
    > 
    >             Did we really have shell scripts without a shebang line?
    > 
    >             Yeah, let's fix !
    > 
    >             On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:03 AM Sergei Ustimenko
    >             <merkel05@gmail.com <mailto:merkel05@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > 
    >                 HI Martin,
    > 
    >                 As you've suggested I've simply added bash's shebang.
    > 
    >                 It wouldn't add any problem since, as David have mentioned,
    > 
    >                 no bash - no build. I've also quickly checked for
    >                 similar cases
    > 
    >                 and found one.
    > 
    >                 An updated patch is below.
    > 
    >                 diff --git
    >                 \
a/test/jdk/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh  >          \
b/test/jdk/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh  >          \
---  >                 \
a/test/jdk/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh  >          \
+++  >                 \
b/test/jdk/sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/GeneratePropertyPassword.sh  >          \
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@  >                 +#!/bin/bash
    >                 +
    >                   #
    >                   # Copyright (c) 2003, 2018, Oracle and/or its
    >                 affiliates. All rights reserved.
    >                   # DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS
    >                 FILE HEADER.
    > 
    >                 Regards,
    > 
    >                 Sergei
    > 
    >                 On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 22:27, Martin Buchholz
    >                 <martinrb@google.com <mailto:martinrb@google.com>> wrote:
    > 
    >                     I don't know if there's an official policy on how
    >                     ultra-portable tests are supposed to be.  In
    >                     practice, you probably won't be able to build
    >                     openjdk on a system without bash.
    > 
    >                     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:12 PM Sergei Ustimenko
    >                     <merkel05@gmail.com <mailto:merkel05@gmail.com>> wrote:
    > 
    >                         Hi Martin,
    > 
    >                         That sounds good!
    > 
    >                         I've counted all the sh-shebangs and it appears that
    > 
    >                         there are at least 66 of them inside the test/
    >                         directory,
    > 
    >                         where only 12 bashes.
    > 
    >                         I've also ran the search  in order to identify
    >                         all the
    > 
    >                         occurrences that use either [[ or == and found only
    > 
    >                         three of them that use "==". That one for example:
    > 
    >                         \
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/sandbox/file/f94276ccc9fc/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/jit/tiered/tieredTest.sh#l63
  > 
    >                         of course `dash` reports failure in that case.
    > 
    >                         So I'm quite hesitant in that case and not
    >                         really sure
    > 
    >                         what to do. I haven't also found any existent
    >                         JBS ticket
    > 
    >                         for such /bin/sh => /bin/bash a replacement.
    > 
    >                         So any advise in this case would be appreciated!
    > 
    >                         Regards,
    > 
    >                         Sergei
    > 
    >                         On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 18:32, Martin Buchholz
    >                         <martinrb@google.com
    >                         <mailto:martinrb@google.com>> wrote:
    > 
    >                             I would not try to remove all bash-isms from
    >                             openjdk. Instead I would find instances of
    >                             /bin/sh that need to be changed to /bin/bash.
    > 
    >                             (Ubuntu's use of /bin/sh -> /bin/dash is
    >                             technically correct, but caused much suffering
    > 
    >                             \
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/61463  > 
    >                             )
    > 
    


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic