[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject:    RE: RFR (S) 8210775: JVM TI Spec missing copyright
From:       Iris Clark <iris.clark () oracle ! com>
Date:       2018-09-17 17:18:22
Message-ID: c2f33e0d-200d-45dc-a934-fdec3f6fada5 () default
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi, Mandy, David, and Serguei.

Thank you for taking the time to Review.  I've pushed the changeset.

iris

-----Original Message-----
From: Serguei Spitsyn 
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 12:57 AM
To: David Holmes <david.holmes@oracle.com>; Iris Clark <iris.clark@oracle.com>; \
                serviceability-dev <serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: RFR (S) 8210775: JVM TI Spec missing copyright

+1

Thanks,
Serguei


On 9/16/18 9:27 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> This looks fine to me Iris.
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
> On 15/09/2018 8:01 AM, Iris Clark wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > Please review the following changes to add a copyright line to the 
> > end of the generated jvmti.html file:
> > 
> > 8210775:   JVM TI Spec missing copyright
> > bug:   https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210775
> > webrev:   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/8210775/webrev/
> > 
> > The year ranges are taken from the copyright line contained within 
> > the first comment block of the source itself.
> > 
> > These are the generated files before and after this changeset:
> > 
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/8210775/jvmti-old.html
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/8210775/jvmti-new.html
> > 
> > Note that I did not add an entry to the Change History since it 
> > appears that the recent convention is to document only substantive 
> > changes to the Specification.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Iris
> > 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]