[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       openjdk-serviceability-dev
Subject:    Re: RFR : JDK-8196744 : JMX: Not enough JDP packets received before timeout
From:       Harsha Wardhana B <harsha.wardhana.b () oracle ! com>
Date:       2018-03-20 5:33:08
Message-ID: e05e19d8-a0b7-7c95-fad1-b0c25867eac7 () oracle ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks David.

-Harsha

On Tuesday 20 March 2018 02:13 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Harsha,
>
> Given the negative nature of the test this approach seems quite 
> reasonable.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>> Harsha Wardhana B <harsha.wardhana.b@oracle.com>
>> Ping! Can I have one more review for the below fix?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Harsha
>>
>> On Monday 26 February 2018 10:42 AM, Harsha Wardhana B wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Requesting for review from one more reviewer.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>>> Harsha
>>
>>>
>>
>>> On Wednesday 21 February 2018 10:01 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
>>
>>>> Hi Harsha,
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Not a review, but just a request that you add the explanation of the 
>>
>>>> problem to the CR so we have a record of it. Also, the copyright 
>>
>>>> needs to be updated.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> thanks,
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Chris
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> On 2/20/18 3:30 AM, Harsha Wardhana B wrote:
>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> Please find the fix below for the Jdp test-case.
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196028
>>
>>>>> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hb/8196028/webrev.00/
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> Fix details : The test was receiving JDP packets from other VM and 
>>
>>>>> hence the multi-cast socket was not timing-out. The default timeout 
>>
>>>>> handler was causing test to fail. Added a shutdown method that 
>>
>>>>> passes the test in case of timeout.
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>
>>>>> Harsha
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]